Finally, we’re getting somewhere. It’s been almost a week now since the “assassination attempt” of Donald Trump. And yes, I put it in quotes, while granting fully that one bystander ended up dead and two others ended up critically injured. Some bullets were fired and struck people, of that we have empirical evidence. But as to a bullet striking Donald Trump? And “assassination attempt” meaning that Trump survived a would be assassin’s bullet? We don’t have any information on that, we’re taking his word for it, have been all week. Turns out Heather Cox Richardson has the same qualms as we do. [emphasis added]
Since Saturday’s shooting, it has been notable that there has not been a medical review of Trump’s injuries, although he has said he was injured by a bullet that ripped through his ear. This matters not only because of the extent of his injuries, but also because Trump has made the story part of his identity without any fact check, and the media appears simply to be letting it go on Trump’s say-so, something that adds to the sense that media outlets are treating Trump and Biden differently.
Last night, Trump perhaps tried to address this lack by recounting last Saturday’s shooting. Interestingly, he did not say he was hit by a bullet, but that when he felt the injury he thought, “it can only be a bullet.” Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo today noted a report from local Pennsylvania television station WPXI that four motorcycle officers standing within feet of Trump suffered minor injuries from flying debris. Trump has likely cut off further discussion of the topic by saying it is too painful to tell the story again.
Finally. NOW we are getting somewhere. Let’s see what Josh Marshall has to say:
Here’s a small update on the lack of any word from federal law enforcement or hospital officials on the what and how of the injury Donald Trump suffered last Saturday in western Pennsylvania when a 20-year-old gunman tried to shoot him. As I’ve noted, Pennsylvania State Police initially told reporters on the scene that Trump had been struck by shards of glass. Then Trump himself said he’d been hit with a bullet and that was the end of the matter. There’s small detail from a local news report from last Sunday that suggests it as at least plausible that the initial report was correct, that Trump was struck by some flying debris.
A report from local TV station WPXI at 4:50 PM Sunday said this (emphasis added) …
11 Investigates has learned that four Pittsburgh police officers assigned to the former president’s motorcade yesterday suffered minor injuries during the shooting.
The four motorcycle officers were part of Donald Trump’s escort to and from the rally in Butler.
Sources tell Chief Investigator Rick Earle the officers were just feet away from Trump when shots rang out. The four officers suffered minor injuries from flying debris caused by the bullets.
Sources say the officers were hit with either plastic or metal fragments when the bullets struck objects nearby.
This report certainly doesn’t prove Trump was also hit by flying debris. Trump was the target so the odds of him being struck by a bullet seem, by definition, higher. But it does appear to show pretty conclusively that the gunshots created a spray of flying debris in Trump’s immediate vicinity capable of causing minor injuries. That’s precisely what those initial reports from state law enforcement said happened to Trump, though we still don’t know why. This simply underscores the fact that both possible sources of the injury are very plausible and that we really need law enforcement and/or examining doctors to tell the public what they think happened. Or, perhaps, they don’t know precisely what happened.
Marshall’s report goes on to state, “I’ve heard from different people pointing to photographs or studies claiming the injury we see in press photos isn’t consistent with a grazing firearm injury.” And he freely concdes that he has “zero expertise in ballistics or firearms injuries.” But his point is that, “we’ve never had any word from investigating authorities at all. This is precisely why it’s necessary that we get that. It really couldn’t be simpler. It’s the most normal and standard thing in the world. And it’s a huge failure of the nation’s leading press organizations that they’ve been afraid to press the point because they’ve feared blowback from the Trump campaign.”
And that is in fact the case. It IS a “huge failure of the nation’s leading press organizations,” that they have let Trump define his own injuries without getting professional corroboration. That is such a rookie mistake that if an entry level reporter made it, an editor would go ballistics — in a different era. Not in this one, however.
Trump was struck by whatever on Saturday. He knew the Republican National Convention was starting Monday. He wanted to don his bandage and make a big dramatic splash at the convention, with his bullet wound, his MAGA stigmata, as it were. That makes perfect sense that he would want to do that, but it blows my mind that no reputable media outlet wanted to oppose this.
As we reported here last weekend, both Newsmax and Axios reported that Trump was hit by flying glass shards. The Axios reporter retracted her tweet and the Newsmax reporter augmented his and said that, “President Trump was hit by a bullet.” He was quoting Trump’s post on Truth Social as his source, NOT any medical report or police report. Trump and Trump alone is the source corroborating his medical injuries.
So the highest authority we have in this story so far, is the victim himself, and of course he has every reason in the world to paint himself in the most precarious light, because that generates sympathy and sympathy gets the small-dollar donations going.
Heather Cox Richardson is an independent journalist and historian. Josh Marshall is an independent journalist. The blog you’re reading is independently owned. Apparently, the independent journos and the humble bloggers of this world are the only people interested in the truth, the big boys at the New York Times, Washington Post, etc., et al., are only happy to republish whatever fiction Donald Trump sees fit to dictate to them. They’re stenographers, not journalists.
This story of the four motorcycle officers injured by flying debris is flying under the radar so that Donald Trump’s “bullet” injury can look as dramatic as possible.
I don’t believe he was hit by a bullet. I never did. Something stung his ear and made him say, “Oh.” I saw that and heard it with my own eyes and ears. The media is in a horrifying place if it is surpressing major details of a major story like this and running with whatever a known liar wants them to publish on their front pages.
This is horrific. I hope that since both Josh Marshall and Heather Cox Richardson are respected independent journos and the local Pittsburgh station ran with the story of the injured officers and since enough time has gone by now without a doctor’s report that a demand is soon going to be made for that, and we’ll find out the truth. Finally.
Trump’s injuries are consistent far more with flying debris of some manner which nicked and scratched him, then they are with a bullet striking his ear and “tearing the flesh” as I think he described it.
To me, the giveaway is Don the Con’s claim that he heard the bullet ‘whiz past’
High velocity rounds do NOT ‘whiz’ – they go ‘crack’ as they are supersonic. Also, the impact of a high velocity round that close to his head would have knocked him off his feet.
Your explanation is probably the 15th one that I’ve read that says the exact same thing. The speed of the bullet would have precluded a “whiz” sound. And something moving at that speed, even if it had the slightest contact with Trump’s ear, probably would have taken a piece of it off.
The mainstream media has let this story be buried. This is frightening. If we don’t live in a country where there really is a free press and the truth gets reported, George Orwell, here we come.
I’m having fantasies about repatriating to Ireland again, Daithi. BTW, it’s summer. What time is the sun setting at that northern a latitude? Ten p.m.? Later?
Sunset tonight is 21:43 local time (20:43 GMT)
I thought it would be more at that latitude. The sun is setting here at eight p.m. and we are WAY south of you.
I’m thinking of Ireland for our family if the worst happens we have 2 early 30’s grAnddaughters and custody of a 4 and 6 yo we’ve been to Ireland twice and lived it can you dm me with any nuggets on what we’ll need to do? Thanks
Yes but you’re arguing with facts, against Trump’s lies. Everyone knows you can’t do that.
<
>It is seriously shocking that the press has just let Trump run with this bullet scenario. But the convention is over now, so maybe now we can get down to what happened. If there’s a medical report, in the ER, it would probably show if any small pieces of glass, wood, whatever were removed from his ear. That’s all anybody needs to know.
The shooter was a bad shot. So he missed Trump, probably by a country mile, but he struck something, which then caused “minor injuries” to four cops — and to Trump.
Why would the cartridge in an ear bleed so much? A wound on the forehead might, but it really isn’t normal where there’s mostly cartilage, unless someone is on blood thinners due to heart problems.
And where do you see all the blood? In FRONT of his ear! If a bullet had ‘pierced’ his ear, there would have been blood on his hair behind his ear. Whatever it was did not go thru his ear. Even ‘nicking’ his ear, it should have gotten blood in the area behind his ear.
What it honestly looks like to me is that debris of some sort nicked Trump on the ear and face. That’s what I said the day it happened. Now he may have smeared blood as well. There are two facial streaks and then the bloodied ear.
Don’s ears are very close to his head. Surely a high velocity bullet hitting his ear would at least left a groove along his head. I’m a nasty suspicious person, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the whole thing was a set up, and Donnie had a small capsule of blood concealed in his ear. Look what an assassination attempt did for Ron Reagan. How to increase flagging support.
Supersonic therefor a “crack” yes, knocked off his feet by a .223 passing by his head? No. At 5 grams (1/5 oz) max even at 3x the speed of sound that slug going Passed someone’s head won’t do more than scare their diaper full.
There’s news today in Sweden the the FBI after cracking the shooters phone are coming to a new theory. The shooter was searching for info on mass shootings and googled the times and places of both Trump and Biden events. So Trump was not the target. The people at Trump’s event was. That the shooter chose Trump’s event and not Biden’s they believe was because it was not that far from his home.
I’m not following you. If the shooter just wanted a kill a lot of people, a “mass shooting” why didn’t he simply open fire on the crowd?
I’m just reporting what the news is telling me. And, I forgot to mention, the news article I read also mentioned bombs and stuff was found in the shooters car and on the roof where he was shot they also found, besides the AR-15, a remote detonator. So clearly he must have been planning som mass casualty event, but he was shot before he could pull the trigger on the detonator. The shots killed one man, yes, but there’s no word yet about where that man was located relative to Trump. I’m speculating a little here, but maybe the shootings were just the prelude to the shooter detonating the bombs in his car.
This is the story: https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/KMMKb7/uppgifter-crooks-skot-donald-trump-for-att-han-var-i-narheten
Enligt uppgifterna kan Crooks ha varit ute efter att genomföra en masskjutning. Att han valde ut Trumps kampanjmöte tros ha avgjorts av tajming i tid och rum. Evenemanget hölls bara några mil från 20-åringens hem i Pittsburghs utkanter och i samma veva som det utlystes sökte Crooks information om flera olika politiska möten, skriver CNN.
Efter dådet har FBI gjort flera beslag. Vid Crooks kropp på taket i Butler hittades hans telefon, en fjärrutlösare till bomber som fanns i hans bil och hans pappas halvautomatiska AR-15-gevär som användes i attentatet.
I bilen fanns även en skottsäker väst, en drönare och ytterligare magasin till geväret. I hans föräldrahem hittades ännu fler bomber, 14 skjutvapen, en dator, en hårddisk och en urladdad telefon som tros ha varit 20-åringens reservmobil.
Google translate translation:
According to the information, Crooks may have been out to carry out a mass shooting. The fact that he chose Trump’s campaign rally is believed to have been decided by timing in time and space. The event was held just a few miles from the 20-year-old’s home on the outskirts of Pittsburgh and at the same time as it was announced, Crooks sought information about several different political meetings, writes CNN. After the attack, the FBI has made several seizures. At Crook’s body on the roof of Butler were found his phone, a remote trigger for bombs that were in his car and his father’s AR-15 semi-automatic rifle that was used in the attack. The car also contained a bulletproof vest, a drone and additional magazines for the rifle. In his parents’ home, even more bombs, 14 firearms, a computer, a hard drive and a discharged phone were found that is believed to have been the 20-year-old’s spare mobile.
he wanted to do something infamous, get in the history books. he researched several possible high profile targets. he borrowed his dad’s gun. if he had brought a bump stock, there would have been a lot more dead.
his personality is that of a mass shooter, with no political motive.
I really think the shooter was just a lonely, unmoored kid who was trying to commit suicide, they often don’t want to die alone and taking Trump with him was probably appealing to him.
It’s clear that the wound was from a fragment or a shard and the reason we don’t have a medical report is that it would confirm that. Trump’s head was not turned 180 degrees away from the shooter when the bullet struck. Even if it were, an intact round hitting his ear would have done extensive damage, likely removing his ear entirely. Any other angle and it would have killed him instantly. This is myth creation to endow trump with god-like powers, like Jesus walking on water. The media, as usual, are complicit.
We HAVE to see the medical report from the ER he was taken to. There’s no excuse for further delay.
I wish I could HEAR a version of the shooting where audio folks isolated the sounds so we could more clearly heat the shots and much less of the other sounds. Again for those who don’t know high velocity rifle shots travel at supersonic speeds. Typically high powered hunting rifle that fire “centerfire” cartridges will fire at 2800 feet per second (fps from here on). By centerfire do this. There are two types of bullets – rimfire and centerfire. It’s easy to visually distinguish them for you non-shooters out there. Here’s a picture of rimfire ammo.
Note how regardless of the shape of the bullet itself (rounded, pointed, and then there are pistol rounds with hollow point and other types of front tips) the brass casing is uniform in width from where the bullet fits into the front end all the way down to the small rim at the bottom – which keeps the whole thing (bullet and casing) from sliding past the chamber (the part of the weapon that holds the bullet about to be fired at the back entrance of the barrel) into the actual barrel. (a barrel blocked with anything is dangerous – bad news for someone shooting the gun) Now let’s take a look at a high powered centerfire round.
See the difference? Centerfire rounds can hold more propellant, or in plain terms gunpowder. A larger bullet casing tapers down to a diameter the size of the actual bullet. Again, that ability to hold more propellant allows the bullet to travel at a higher velocity. Even large caliber pistol rounds with big-ass casings will, depending on the round/caliber fire with a muzzle velocity of 800 to 1100fps although there are some both below and above that. For a shorter while they will however still travel at a supersonic speed which is why, despite “silencers” like you see in movies real-fire “silencers” can at best surpress the sound to some degree, especially with a small caliber like a .22 rimfire. (with a special load it’s possible to make a round that leaves the barrel at barely or just below supersonic speeds and the sound can be suppressed to a surprising degree but it takes a really skilled marksman to be accurate with one) But I digress.
High powered centerfire rifle rounds such as used for hunting or in military weapons mostly evolved in the 20th century to shoot at 2800fps. Give or take a bit. What distinguished the .223/5.56mm round of the M-16/AR-15 (and variants) was the smaller bullet was travelling at a much higher velocity. The M-16 (which I would use back in my days in the Corps) had a muzzle velocity of 3250fps. This is/has been pretty much the standard although with tweaks that figure has gone up with some variations so figure 3200-3300fps. That extra 400fps makes for some interesting and devasting consequences.
First, as you might have learned from the epidemic of mass shootings using AR-15s and variants is that the rounds create “cavitation” and instead of a wound track only slightly larger than the bullet of even a high powered centerfire round that travels 2800fps the wound track of the smaller .223/5/56mm bullet creates a wound tracked up severely damaged tissue and ruptured blood vessels that’s 3.5-4 inches wide! Plus, these rounds have a tendency to, once they’ve struck something to literally tumble. That of course makes wounds that much worse.
Now let’s talk distance. I’ve cited muzzle velocity but unless in a vacuum a bullet of any type will start losing speed after leaving the barrel of the gun that fired it. At 140-150 yards not only would a pistol round, even a .50 caliber one from one of those ridiculous Desert Eagles have lost much of it’s initial velocity would be wildly inaccurate. However, the bullet from a high powered rifle like I discussed above would at that range have retained most of that initial velocity. It IS possible and has in fact happened that people are barely nicked or grazed by such a round. In fact a wound can be so slight, even from such a high velocity bullet that it can be closed and treated with a stitch or two or even with the right kind of band-aid. Anyone that’s only been nicked or grazed (and again, it DOES happen) is incredibly lucky. But it IS possible that Trump was barely nicked or grazed by a bullet. However as keeps getting pointed out he wouldn’t hear a whizzing sound. It would be the “crack” of a small piece of metal travelling way above supersonic speed. Any of us who have had bullets fly close to us can attest to that. So Trump (and others) are LYING about that whizzing sound bullshit, as well as pointing to supposed bullet “contrail” in pictures. ONLY if a special high speed camera was set up to take photos of Trump giving his speech (give me a fucking break!) would a photo capture such a thing. What those pictures show is photo shopping, an artifact on the lens of the camera or the software in the camera’s printer card or something miles and miles away in the sky like a small wisp of cloud.
Now, here’s a gruesome possibility which I’ve been hesitant to raise but now feel compelled to. It relates to my first statement about wanting clear audio. We know there were a few people that took serious hits from rifle shots. One died. We have yet to see a ‘tick-tock” much less an actual sketch/diagram from overhead of EXACLY where the man who died and the other shooting victims sat in relation to Trump. From what I can tell from accounts is that the man who died was near the upper left corner of the grandstand of the platform where Trump stood. That means he (and no info. about the other victims who sustained actual verifiable bullet wounds) was “off line” from the line of travel of a bullet from where the shooter was to where Trump was standing. At a minimum 12-q5 feet and perhaps as much as twenty feet or even a bit more!
However, he was struck in the skull or so it’s been reported. Even if the bullet didn’t rip much of his skull to pieces (head shots are weird) it WOULD have broken off small fragments of his skull which would travel at a pretty high velocity themselves. Sorry, but I warned you this would be gruesome. Still, skull fragments is a theory that fits the facts that the video of Trump, as well as these accounts of cops a few feet away being struck by fragments of “something.” That’s why I want to hear this with sound enhancement. We are told the dead firefighter heroically shielded his family when the shooting started.
If he was hit by the first shot (the only victim we know for certain took a bullet to the head) then how could he have shielded his family after he saw Trump get nicked? I’m sure he knew the cracking sound of a high velocity bullet. But if the first shot hit HIM then there’s simply no way he could have (at least intentionally) tried to shield his family! He’d have been dead without knowing what had happened to him.
Now, this type of thing is traumatic both for those who are hit and for others nearby. Even more so for those who wind up with splattered blood (or worse, brain or body tissue) on them. It’s quite easy for me to believe their memories are faulty and/or that they’ve mixed up what happened in fractions of sections. Placing specific half or quarter seconds out of sequence in their minds. Or misinterpreting what physically happened or a combination of both. I hate to sound cold about it but the terrible sight of a loved one dying that was sitting right there with you and them slumping over on top of his wife/kids is something that could in the horror of it all easily be interpreted as him “using his body as a shield to protect him.” I do NOT want to so much as imply they have been lying. But it’s quite understandable how they could mentally process what they lived through that way. I know if it were me I’d want to remember a loved one who died in such a way/setting in the best possible light. Especially since by all accounts he was the kind of guy who would have if able done exactly what his family says he did.
But again I go back to if he was hit by the first shot, and others behind Trump (all of whom had to be several rows back and off to the side from Trump) then the young man was a lousy shot who might also have “choked” in the moment. He wouldn’t be the first. However if that first, or even if it was the second shot that hit (and killed) the dead firefighter in the head there would have been skull fragments flying and it’s quite plausible some if not most would have gone flying Trump’s way. Not at supersonic speed but enough to injure him and others. AND one of them might have nicked him in the ear.
We may never know. Just as so much of the media was cowed by Bush 43 after 911 to let him get away with his Saddam has nuclear weapons and even had a hand in the attacks so he could avenge his daddy by going to war in Iraq and taking out Saddam, today’s media doesn’t have the guts to really dig out the truth. IF Trump loses someday someone MIGHT do the digging and learn something along the lines of what I’ve suggested. Even so, would any news outlet carry it? Would a publisher have the guts to put out the book?
I hope I’m wrong but I doubt we’ll ever be told the true story. Much of it might already be known. But for those who own/run news outlets it doesn’t “play” nearly as dramatically than the narrative we’ve been being given. It’s all about attention/ratings and therefore revenue and “Trump got shot” (oh, and some nice family guy happened to get shot and even died in “throwaway” parts of stories) is a LOT more dramatic. If the story were someone tried to kill Trump but he was a bad shot, and bullet fragments from his skull injured some others including Trump would already be out of the news!
Journalists/pundits are already defensive about their incessant OMFG the debate “proves” Biden is a walking vegatable and HAS to step aside while IGNORING so many more instance of Trump showing HE is the one clearly in mental decline. They know goddam well they blew that one, so they will really fight with all they have to avoid admitting they blew this one too!
For some reason the image of centerfire rounds(bullets) didn’t insert into my comment. Here’s what they look like
Here is what you are looking for. An analysis of the bullets. Sure sounds like two shooters were involved. Besides the sniper who put the kid away.
https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1814398580154872092
I gave up after 25 min. of it. I didn’t make notes as I went along (wish I’d thought to before hitting play) but I think the whole thing is half-baked, He jumps around too much and I don’t agree with some of his contentions. BTW I know shooting, weapons and tactics. Unforunately I know more than I wish about the damage bullets do. While I wouldn’t put that video in tinfoil hat territory to me it looks like someone skeptical of the proverbial “official narrative” (hey, nothing wrong with that – I sometimes am too) but despite his “deep state” comments at the beginning I really tried to set that aside and give his argument an honest and open-minded look. As is so often the case with some event where there’s some chaos initial reports, or parts of them we “know” are “facts” turn out to be wrong. However there’s an urge to figure things out right away. There’s truth to stuff about an initial rush to judgement but the same can be said for analysis even two or three days (or more) later.
Here’s what I want to see the media put out and which the (now former) Director of the Secret Service should have had ready yesterday. A LARGE overhead diagram of the area from overhead AND a photo. Both would have the positions of the shooter, Trump and each person shot and killed. Then another set with lines (one color for Trump and a second for others who got shot) with exact distances between the shooter and each victim. There’s been time to establish which shots in the sequence struck each person so a timeline should have been put up.
Show us, the public THAT. The fact that hasn’t been done makes me question what happened. One thing in the video well in is important. It shows a bit of cell phone video of what I agree was a bullet striking a piece of grandstand. All kinds of shrapnel was generated. It was apparently a later shot but it’s clear the shooter wasn’t all that skilled. What if his first shot struck a piece of grandstand and sent shrapnel Trump’s way? Four motorcycle cops were on the stage near him and it seems got treated for shrapnel wounds. Was Trump struck by a piece of shrapnel from badly missed first shot? It’s a theory that fits the facts but yeah, I can see a lot of effort (including from an embarrassed Secret Service which damn well has good reason to be) going into covering that up. Especially since Trump immediately started his schtick. The howling if an alternate theory of a shrapnel wound would wake the dead!
The saddest part of all of what has transpired in the country since 2016 is the ascendancy of a womanizing, lying, cheating, egomaniacal ignoramus who had only one thing going for him. That’s the fake persona of a successful businessman who could lead the country out of debt (like his failed and bankrupt businesses) and who knows how to work the system and the media to the point of creating a following of largely illiterate, undereducated lemmings who worship him like he’s the second coming. People aren’t afraid of him but of his rabid followers who threaten anyone who dares to oppose or tell the truth about him. We have become a nation of cowards in high places.
Maybe I’m naive, but I have to say that I’m surprised that the MSM rolled over like this. Time to get the medical report.
“I’m surprised that the MSM rolled over like this.”
I’m not.
They minimize anything even slightly ‘off’ about Dimwit Donny, but maximize at any chance they can, Biden’s ‘age problems’.
Those “rabid followers who threaten anyone who dares to oppose or tell the truth about him” are the true source of Trump’s power. How many times have we heard from Trump critics about sick fucks phoning in death and rape threats, and “I know where your kids go to school” when these critics DARED to say something negative about the orange baboon? My kids are adults now and can handle themselves, but how would I react if I had little ones at home? If it weren’t for these homicidal morons, we could just laugh and point at Trump when he started his nonsense.
Watch the video, I posted this after watching the first clip released the following day. Read the first one twice, it’s what caught my attention right off:
When rapist tRump reaches to his ear, his hand comes back with no blood.
The crowd didn’t run, some approached the stage with camera phones and took pics.
Secret service danced and jerked around like poor actors on a set.
Secret service allowed rapist felon tRump to squirm out of their body shield to pump his fist and scream, fight. Multiple times.
Secret service allowed the rapist to stop and pick up his hat then, his shoes. They exhibited no urgency.
The structure where the shooter positioned himself is well within the parameter any security would not only patrol but would situate their own snipers on the roof.
No one in the crowd behind the traitor left, they bent down then stood. No one left nor looked even close to panicking. Even as secret service surrounded the traitor.
Neither secret service nor security directed the crowd, none went into the crowd to give directions, assurances, or instructions.
This whole thing is hinky as hell. It was not an assassination attempt, it was likely a mass shooting attempt but that does not explain the many failures on the secret service and security parts.
I replayed the incident in slow motion and there was no blood on Trump’s hand after grabbing his ear, he also opened his hand between his fist pumps while leaving the stage still no blood. Of course during the RNC Convention Trump’s version was “I moved my right hand to my ear and brought it down and my hand was COVERED with blood, absolutely blood all over the place”. Where is all this blood in these screenshots?
rainj…add in the MSM who, being money whores, will lie, distort, and create fabrications to enrich the coffers of their owners as we descend into HELL. Thanks Denis for the education.
HIPPA.
I don’t believe there are any written nor electronic records. it was all verbal in the ER, all billing charges written off. Absolutely no records with a warning to staff.
I work in the medical world and this is how it works for certain celebrities, Congress, and other deemed important people.
Wow. Not saying you’re wrong but if that’s the case, that is seriously malpractice. The victim is a presidential candidate. It’s got to be illegal to just not take notes or practice medicine in this situation.
You work in the “medical world” yet can’t get the acronym right. Take a hike.
Denis Elliott – in one video I saw, the SS Sniper on the roof behind Trump had his sights trained towards the shooter prior to the first shot and it looked to me that the kickback from the SS Sniper’s gun correlated with the sound of the first shot. The video I saw was on X posted by @CollinRugg at 9:41 PM · Jul 17, 2024
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1813675307125338199
Campaign is losing steam cue Rittenhouse wannabe incel to hose the crowd, but shoot above their heads. Give trump some red tinted ear candy, drop and pop the little baggie behind your ear, smear on face.
Don’t let any reliable medicos ever see your ear.
How long can he wear that ear diaper? Will someone have to bite his ear to show any damage? Maybe Kimberly will do it for him… An undamaged ear is gonna be hard to explain.
If he’s the new Jesus cuz of this then what are the four injured police officers? Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John? Hallephuckingluah! Praise the God who can’t shoot worth a damn!!! Whatever happened to being killed first, then come back from the dead? I guess the sequel is never as good as the original. Oh well…on your knees peasants!!!
Uh oh…I guess someone CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH! LOL! Sorry if I hurt your sensitive, ignorant, fascist fefes! NOT!
“You say you lost your faith, but you know it’s not like that. You had no faith to lose and you know it.” Bob Dylan