If one starts with the objective truth that Mitch McConnell should never be on any Democrats’ Christmas card list, it is then safe to move on to some issues on which one can slightly nod with Mitch. The most productive common ground can be found in the central premise that the United States has an essential – and thus active, role to play in guiding global affairs. There is the pragmatic point that, given that wars wreck stuff (Including lives) it is best to fight them “over there” rather than here. Selfishness alone justifies managing issues elsewhere. But along with that duty comes a more subtle implication – it is hard to lecture the world on democratic norms and doing the moral thing without first having one’s own house in order. The commitment guides us both here and abroad. To that end, McConnell took to the Reagan Presidential Library to throw a tomahawk at incoming president Donald Trump’s isolationism. Trump often calls his view “America First” – it appears as though McConnell sees it as nothing more than falling behind.
So it was at the house that Reagan built, in front of the reliably conservative folks who tend to show up at the Reagan library, that McConnell got a standing ovation in pushing back against Trump’s “America First” agenda according to a new report in Politico. McConnell said:
“Within the party Ronald Reagan once led so capably, it is increasingly fashionable to suggest that the sort of global leadership he modeled is no longer America’s place. But let’s be absolutely clear: America will not be made great again by those who are content to manage our decline.”
That silence you would otherwise hear is that accompanying a near war-cry. The context was foreign policy but you will note that McConnell didn’t limit his definition of “decline” and so make of that what you will. The use of “otherwise” is inserted to allow for the standing ovation breaking through what had to be some shock. McConnell went on:
“At both ends of our politics, a dangerous fiction is taking hold — that America’s primacy and the fruits of our leadership are self-sustaining. Even as allies across NATO and the Indo-Pacific renew their own commitments to hard power, to interoperability, and to collective defense, some now question America’s own role at the center of these force-multiplying institutions and partnerships.
Yeah. As I’ve written before, there is no rule stating that the U.S. is and forever will be the world’s leader in much of anything. It is equally true that there is nothing requiring us to maintain a vibrant democracy. Both require renewed commitment over time. One worries that all the goodwill and raw power accumulated over 80 years of post-war economic and military dominance could be lost in only a few years.
Again, all of this is couched in the somewhat safer ground of foreign affairs. But again, McConnell is shrewd enough to know that his carefully chosen words invite the listener to apply the warning more broadly.. He is an institutionalist bent on keeping those institutions relatively intact – albeit only after having demolished the very idea of a balanced SCOTUS by blowing up what had been institutional norms. Be that as it may, he is drawing a clear line as to what he believes to be tolerable as to American posture in the world, with the unsaid but overlapping implications for what happens here at home.
His power is certainly waning, but it’s not nothing – not even close. He still lords over a ton of money in his leadership PAC and he can bestow it on anyone he sees as following his lead. Don’t think that Republicans don’t know and account for the reality. That money becomes even more important given Trump’s notorious need to horde contributions for his own personal political use. Thus the GOP Senate candidates must often look to McConnell for hard cash. No, McConnell still has plenty of power to move the Senate even as he wanes into retirement.
We have seen him take shots at Trump before. I don’t recall one this clear, this sweeping, this uncompromised, nor at this critical a time – with Trump soon to move back into the White House. Oh, and there is that standing ovation. Apparently there remains some disenchantment on the Right with Trump’s direction. “America first” doesn’t mean the same thing to everyone, even on the right. Interesting.
God Bless: I can be reached at [email protected] and on X @JasonMiciak and on Bluesky






















McConnell gets no props from me. He’s the reason we’re in the mess. If he had actually done the right thing and removed the orange stink bomb after it was impeached, he wouldn’t have to stand up and make vacuous pronouncements now. McConnell is, and forever will be, the instrument of our demise, even more so than the frump because he did not step up and do the right thing when he had the chance and the power. Hot air.
If you will note, he didn’t get “props.”
I noted one area in which there is some overlap – active global leadership.
Acknowledging one area of shared interest (Not even extending to priorities in leading, just the need to lead alone) is not even close to support, nor props.
I try to objectively cover the dynamic on the right. No props at all. Only the dynamic and one area of common ground.
jason
Not to mention he held up one Supreme Court nomination for just about a full year because *the election* only to turn around and ram another nomination through despite there being less than two months before another election.
In 2016, he shredded the Constitution so “the people” could have a say in a SCOTUS nomination (via electing a President) even though there is NO provision in the Constitution by which the people should have any say (hell, when the Founding Fathers inserted the “with the advice and consent of the Senate” clause, the people didn’t even have a say in choosing their Senators–they were appointed by the various states’ legislatures). But, come 2020, suddenly, he faked a major “senior moment” by “forgetting” his 2016 action. (As the Church Lady would say, “Isn’t that convenient?”)
A stopped clock may be right twice a day but that doesn’t mean you don’t try to get it fixed so it’s right all the time. McConnell may have made some sense and been in the right on this occasion, but it is, by NO means, worth praising him, even slightly.
I don’t have any liking for McConnell, but let’s face reality. The most effective, probably the only effective, check on Trump is Congress, and particularly the Senate. In both houses the Republicans hold only a thin majority. Since the election I’ve been looking for signs of a bloc of Senate Republicans — and not many are needed — to perform this function. It is inherently bipartisan because what’s really at stake is the survival of the power and function of the Senate as such. Look at it this way— without the considerable Democratic caucus in the Senate, McConnell would not be able to do this at all. And as I say, this is a fight for the very survival of the Senate, which really means, of our system of government. So I rather think we’re in for a bit of bipartisanship like we haven’t seen from McConnell in all his years as majority leader. SO for all his fuckery in the past, this is not all about McConnell. This Politico article gives a taste of what I am talking about:
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/21/gop-lame-duck-senators-trump-cabinet-picks-00190742
I specifically mentioned the SCOTUS abuse as unforgivable.
I continue to be stunned by people’s interpretation of the objective review (As opposed to conclusions which are entirely similar to everyone) as somehow “conservative” or at least against some here.
I have committed to objective review of facts in analysis. It’s frustrating to get pushback even on setting out facts, even when conclusion is in opposition to red.
Just odd
jason
I think you’ve got it about right Jason.
Pointing out the widening fissures on the other side doesn’t mean we have to stand on either side of the crack.
Jason, I wasn’t pushing back at you. I was just stating my deep and abiding distrust and disgust for Mitch McConnell. You’re a good writer and I appreciate your perspective, which 99% of the time I share.
It’s easy for mcconnell or others to stand up and criticize when the orange felon isn’t right there. And I don’t believe he is running again so he doesn’t have to worry about being primaried. But those who do worry cannot and will not stand firm. Muskrat bought the residency for the felon and for his own greed. He will not let a few senators or representatives, on either side of the aisle, keep him from his goal. And neither will the felon. I have already seen democratic elected officials bend the knee. We cannot count on anyone doing the right thing when push comes to shove.
McConnell—yet another case of “pot…kettle…black”