“Beware of pretty faces that you find, a pretty face can hide an evil mind.” — Secret Agent Man
Have you noticed that Melania Trump thinks that military outfits are really swank? What is that about, you suppose? Is she missing the good old days in the KGB? Is she ready to flee to Vlad’s side and comfort him as Ukraine spirals more and more out of his control? One thing is certain, she’s not looking for a return match in the White House and neither is anybody else. On that much we can all agree.
Mel sat recently for an interview with Fox News. This was after she announced she would do another NFT campaign to benefit foster children. Her last charity event fell on its butt, you may recall, because she was fundraising for a charity that didn’t exist in the State of Florida. At that time she lashed out at the press as “Literal dream killers.” But Fox News got lucky and Mel agreed to talk to them.
In first interview since leaving the WH, Melania is asked, “With your business background, and your fashion background, and your beauty, never on the cover of Vogue?”
A – “They’re biased .. I had much more important things to do .. in the WH than be on the cover of Vogue.” pic.twitter.com/OPENMbpcl5— Ron Filipkowski ?? (@RonFilipkowski) May 14, 2022
Oh, indeed she did. She had to;
- Work on the “fucking Creesmuss decorations”;
- Destroy the Rose Garden;
- Wear stilettos on the plane to a disaster area, which earned her the title “Hurricane Barbie”‘;
- And the piece de resistance, the pea coat, “I Really Don’t Care, Do U?”
Not sure what the reporter is referring to about her fashion sense or her business sense, but then this is Fox News we’re discussing.
Melania and hubby were dubbed “The King and Queen Of Cruelty” shortly after the pea coat incident by New York Times columnist Charles M. Blow. That is the best title ever afforded them, in my opinion.
Is this what Mel left behind and she yearns for?
This isn’t the first time she’s worn something like this.
No, Mel likes the military look, no question about it.
We’re so glad to know that she was blase about being passed over for the cover of vogue. Her formers BFFs Stephanie Grisham and Stephanie Winston Wolkoff say differently, but what the hey.
— Literal Lefty (@LeftyLiteral) May 14, 2022
Interesting that Melania is being touted as a businesswoman — and she is a member of a legitimate profession. The world’s oldest, in fact.
And in all fairness, there are plenty of women who have started out as models, Playboy centerfolds, what have you and gone on to careers in acting, or working in executive positions at companies like Playboy. That is not unknown. But Melania isn’t batting in that league. To pretend that she is, is to actually set her up for ridicule. It would #BeBest to pretend that she is what she is and nothing more — a pretty face, preserved through the ages by Botox.
A pretty face? I wouldn’t even give her that, with the angry, hateful scowl she usually displays. Pretty is as pretty does, and there’s nothing pretty about that one.
We’re not objective, because we’ve seen her actions and her actions say all you need to know about what’s going on inside of her. I give her credit for basic good looks and then of course she’s had everything done to her that cosmetic surgery can do. So she looks good. But so would a box of shit if you wrapped it up in gold paper with silver fabric bows and put Godiva chocolates on it.
She sure spent a lot of time whining about how she never got to be on their cover, then.
(She isn’t beautiful, IMO, and would have been better looking without the cosmetic work, based on what she looked like before attracting the former guy.)
My husband calls her “the Euro ho.” He calls try “,the 8tj grade bully who never grew up.”
By George,,I think he’s got it.
I think she is objectively pretty (“beautiful” is a higher bar.) She has good bones (and yes, I know, some of us would love to beable to see the bones after decomposition.) And she does hae a good figure – and the military look does look good on women with good figures (the same is true for men, but so many men who don’t have good figures think they do….)
The thing is, it’s impossible to be objective when one knows so much about what a horrible person she is.
Sure hope she lets us know what it was she was doing that was so important. As first ladies go she was perhaps the most do-nothing firstie ever so letting us know will move her a little bit down that list…maybe.
As for being a shrewd businesswoman, she ended up marrying a disgusting scumbag not for money, but for debt. Those two shallow, narcissistic idiots were made for each other.