“So Goodbye Yellow Brick Road.” The Biggest New Sheriff In The Wake Of The Chauvin Verdict.

14
1054

I wrote previously about all of the possible changes to upcoming investigations and trials concerning police officers, especially white police officers, involved in the killing of unarmed black men and women. But there is one almost veratrin change out there that I found that I thought was significant enough to earn its own discussion.

And that change has to do with what may quite possibly be the strongest, most fundamental aspect of protection for rogue police officers. And that is their defense.

Since at least as far back as what may well have been the first video taped police atrocity, Rodney King, when called to task for their abuses, the defense had almost always been that of the almost superhuman black man, drugged up on crack, or heroin, or PCP, almost totally uncontrollable, requiring only the strongest methods of containment. And in almost every case, it has worked like a charm. Because in a land of majority white voters, it fit their preconceived prejudices.

Since the first day of the trial, I have harbored a deep disgust for Derek Chauvin’s lawyer, Eric Nelson. Not because he was defending Chauvin, but because to me that he was a lazy, unprepared lawyer who felt that he had the ace-on-the-hole already in his pocket. Namely, the scary, superhuman, toked up black man defense.

For balance and perspective, here’s an example. In 64 years, I have done my share of juries, including being foreman on two civil cases. And as s result, I have a little personal insight into the behavior of juries.

We watch shit. Hell, it’s our hob. There’s a reason why the defense table is placed closest to the jury box. When the testimony is going on we watch the witness,  the counsels, and the defendant. We like to see everybody’s reaction as to what’s going on with the testimony at the moment.

Never have I seen a more piss poor prepared defense attorney than Eric Nelson. Normally, when the plaintiff or prosecutor has a witness on the stand, the defense attorney sits there at the table, a legal pad and pencil in front of him, and takes notes from the testimony to use in his cross examination.

Nelson couldn’t be bothered with any of that shit. When prosecution witnesses were testifying, he had a stack of folders in front of him. And he sat there, flipping pages and making notes before flipping them again. Mostly, what Nelson looked like was that he was signing off on his expense reports and billable hours for the secretary so he got paid on time. I cannot even begin to tell you how terrible this kind of inattention to the proceedings looks to a juror. But Nelson felt protected.

Because Nelson was following the standard cop defense playbook. George Floyd was a big, and I mean big black man, somewhere around 6’8″ and 240 pounds. And there were drugs in his system! He could spiral out of control at any moment! Not only that, but he was a smoker, with clogged arteries, and an enlarged heart from hypertension. God! Talk about a witches stew just waiting to strike him down! It’s a wonder the cops even touched him before he collapsed at their feet!

But this time it didn’t work. You had a team of dedicated prosecutors who followed the evidence, presented it, and made a mockery of Nelson’s lame ass attempts at cross examination, mostly because Nelson was paying no attention to the direct testimony. And in less that 12 hours of deliberation,  a jury came back and told Nelson to Get that lame shit outta here!

But this is the critical thing. That should have worked. Because it was the standard cop defense mantra of almost the last half a century. And this time the jurors rejected it in an almost insultingly short amount of time. And that opens up another totally different can of worms.

Which is a total disaster for criminal defense law firms all over the country. Because it means that they’re going to have to come up with a new strategy. Because the good old tried and true didn’t work. The advent of video cell phone evidence, social justice activism, and just plain police abuses are going to be more difficult to defend.

That may well end up being the biggest “New Sheriff” that came to town with the George Floyd guilty verdict. Because, as more readily available and conclusive evidence against bad cops becomes available, and social justice forces continue to push in the streets every day for justice, it becomes harder for these defense attorneys to defend what everybody can see with their own eyes. I’m going to be interested to see what happens with Chauvin’s three fellow officers awaiting trial in August once he is sentenced in June. This should be interesting.

Follow me on Twitter at @RealMurfster35

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.

14 COMMENTS

  1. This is as it should be. The first brick in the wall of white privilege is coming down. It is more than time for the end of cops being able to act with impunity.

    • Your take on this is a hopeful view into the future, a future that may be off in the distance, but I certainly was very glad to see this outcome …

      YES, it is painfully obvious that blacks HAVE been at a disadvantage in many situations … “The Good Ole Boys”, means just what it says, and these people are at the center of most problems, political, criminal and money concerns … the core of those GOP boys in the band of Congress, have skewered almost everything out there, towards money rewards for the richest and more cost for those that don’t get to wash and wax their own planes and boats, get paid full pay rate for retirement, or struggle to keep food on the kitchen table …

      Keep your faith on the changes coming, I see the pain in the eyes of those that are getting caught doing those very things against the average citizens …

  2. Interesting observations from a juror perspective. I’ve never served on a jury but my spouse has served on several, and jurors pay attention. Lawyer demeanor is very important, and lawyers who don’t take the proceedings seriously or treat the jury with respect do so at their peril.

    • Thank you!!! That was the thing/ as a former huror that kept coming b ack to me…There is no way that all of those folders he was thumbing through had jack shit to do with the testimony, he was completely disconnected from what was going on in the courtroon…

  3. I never got to serve on a jury. One time I got all the way into the jury box during voir dire, and the case was going to be about a Black defendant in Los Angeles who didn’t stop for cops and kept driving.

    The prosecutor was questioning potential jurors and asked me “do you believe the rumor that Black people are pulled over more frequently than whites?” It was a really weirdly phrased question. I took the process very seriously and said I wasn’t sure what rumor he was referring to. “The idea that blacks have a higher likelihood of being pulled over…that rumor.”

    I replied, “I’m not clear what you’re asking, it’s just objective fact that police are more likely to pull over a black man than others.” Then the lawyer went to his desk, wrote something, and used his wild card to dismiss me.

    I’m not sure it was a great use of his dismissal point. I would have listened to the facts, and it should have been pretty cut and dry whether the defendant did something wrong or not. The judge could show leniency, but my job would have been to vote that it either happened or didn’t.

  4. As author and attorney Andrew Vachss has put it numerous times in his books, prep really is key to any trial. Leaving aside the racist crap that this clown of a defense attorney was relying on to carry the day, he hadn’t prepped at all, as you pointed out, Murf. He just thought that he had a fait accompli verdict in his pocket and that, more than anything, is what got his client convicted of all charges. Never trust that guy to read a room after this big a stumble.

    Might I recommend Mr. Vachss’ novel Aftershock? In addition to tackling some weighty topical issues, it also has an entertaining courtroom sequence that is basically this trial if the prosecution had been as ill-prepared as Chauvin’s defense attorney. In deference to your glaucoma issues, Murf, I would recommend you get the audiobook.

    • Thanks!!! The lawyer I most have admired in my life, iconic LA prosecutor Vince Bugliosi, who put Charlie Manson away, once wrote that the day he was handled a file for prosecution, was the day he started crafting his closing argument…He amended it on an almost dauly basis, but his goal was to leave no relevant fact uncovered in his final remarks…

  5. From January, 1985, to September, 1993, I worked as a legal secretary for the Marin County Public Defender’s Office in Marin County, California. We had about 11 attorneys. Never, did they use the strategy of Eric Nelson. They were always completely prepared, paid attention to the prosecutors, asked the right questions of the witnesses. In other words, they did the job the way that they were supposed to do it. I enjoyed working there and was sorry to leave when I became disabled.

    • Eoe!@!@@ I am SO in awe of you!!! I mean it…Every person charged with a crime has the right to a fair trial, with a lawyer to ensure that the prosecution doesn’t cheat or cut corners…And I’m glad to heatr your words, it restores my faith in at oeast a portion of the defense bvar…

  6. Good piece, Murf, and you nailed it. That worthless POS made me sick just to watch. He just had a kind of smugness or something about him as if he wondered why he and his client even had to be there. I have sat on a few juries before I couldn’t anymore due to disability, and it’s a great place for people watching. Facial expressions, body language, tone of voice, there’s so much information to be gleaned. i am very happy with this verdict; this prosecutor and his team certainly earned it. I think we all know there is so much more to be done, but this one radiant beam of justice shone on us all – and I loved it.

    • Exactly!!! And the ONE thing I learned as a juror was that we are cocky…WE are the ultimate arbiters of fact, and we donb’t like being lied to…And when Nelson directly misrepresented the evidence twice, once slapped down by the prosecution, and once by the judge, I knew that he had poisoned himself to that jury…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here