Okay, so that title is a bit disgusting, but it emphasizes her and what she has done very well. Good gods. It’s hard to believe she came right out and said something like this. There was much screaming. We have a link to the video courtesy of Raw Story. The article is from Media Matters For America and their staff:
As for Epstein, I’ve said this before, but just as a reminder, I do know somebody very, very close to this case who is in a position to know virtually everything. Not everything, but virtually everything. And this person has told me from the start years and years ago, that Jeffrey Epstein, in this person’s view, was not a pedophile. This is this person’s view, who was there for a lot of this, but he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls. And I realized this is disgusting. I’m definitely not trying to make an excuse for this. I’m just giving you facts that he wasn’t into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby.
Not a pedophile. Excuse me? What the hell is she talking about, to say something like that? There’s right-wing and then there’s RWNJ. Maybe it’s a twisted version of approval for Trump. But people believe this woman? She’s pulling this crap out of thin air! And she has a source who was “very, very close to this case”. Okay, then release the name and/or give us something concrete! Let someone else confirm (that she’s nutso).
And that is what I believed, and that is what I was reliably told for many years. And it wasn’t until we heard from Pam Bondi that they had tens of thousands of videos of alleged — forgive me, they used to call it kiddie porn, now they call it child sexual abuse material — on his computer that, for the first time, I thought, oh, no, he was an actual pedophile. I mean, only a pedophile gets off on young children abuse videos. She’s never clarified it, and I don’t know whether it’s true. I have to be honest, I don’t really trust Pam Bondi’s word on the Epstein matters anymore.
Gee, ya think? At least a RWNJ actually thinks Bondi is a little … sleazy? We’ve been watching Blondi for months and *we* already knew that. There is disorder in the ranks. Pam Blondi has been playing fast and loose with a *bunch* of things, but Megyn is just noticing? She needs to get with the picture here. We’ve already heard about Petey Hegseth, with a little bit about Ice Barbie Noem and Ka$h Smash Patel. They still make the news every so often, but she doesn’t talk about them much. So, wow, Megyn doesn’t like Pam. Hmmmm.
Yeah, so I don’t know what’s true about him, but we have yet to see anybody come forward and say I was under 10, I was under 14 when I first came within his purview. You can say that’s a distinction without a difference. I think there is a difference. There’s a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know? It’s sick. Every time we start talking about Epstein, it makes your skin crawl. The whole thing is just disgusting.
She needs to make up her mind. Megyn has a “source” who knows Very Important Things. But she thinks Epstein is creepy, that he makes her skin crawl. And she hasn’t added any information as to who the source is. There’s something more behind this. What is it? It makes you wonder how much she’s getting paid to say crap like this that isn’t from her media home. Inquiring minds want to know. Well, it should come out soon enough. All we have to do is keep our eyes open for it.
[EDIT: This just came out]
Democratic strategist Ally Sammarco believes that Kelly’s claims could have a serious impact on her future. “This is career-ending for Megyn Kelly,” Sammarco told The Beast. “Fifteen-year-olds are CHILDREN. They can’t drive. They can’t see rated R movies. But disgusting 50-year-old men should be allowed to rape them? Goodbye. Forever.”
Friends, I know everyone begs you for money. I promise, among all those asking for spare change, we are the smallest and the hardest working. We’re a group of old, disabled people, except for one writer in his mid-50s. The rest of us are in our sixties and seventies, and this is a labor of love. All we’re asking for is the chance to keep telling the truth about Trump and help ensure democracy survives. If you can help, please do. Thank you. Ursula
A very very big can of worms – maybe even a barrel.
Now open both ends and the worms wriggling out everywhere.
Too many to stop or kill.
And now we look carefully, they’re not worms, they’re facts.
Kelly’s right: “Pedophelia” is defined as sexual attraction to pre-pubescent children. The age of pubescence is given as 13. Sexual attraction to pubescent children is called “hebephilia” so its practitioners are “hebephiles.” Childhood is defined as lasting until age 18. So rather than calling slimebag Epstein a pedophile, call him, more accurately, a “raper of children.” It’s accurate and, I think, sounds even more damning, if that’s possible.
Ephebophilia is the primary sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents, generally ages 15 to 19 and showing Tanner stages 4 to 5 of physical development.