Something is very wrong. If someone asked me to point to two or three of the most obviously “Russian-compromised” figures on the national stage, and we excluded Trump, I’d say Tucker Carlson, Paul Gosar, and Tulsi Gabbard. It is astonishing that Tulsi Gabbard hasn’t been investigated more thoroughly because it was so obvious that she was a MAGA “Democrat,” and someone who might run as a third-party candidate from the Left to draw votes away from Biden.

And nothing has ever made much sense regarding Kyrstin Sinema except for the fact that she’s extremely proud of herself and arrogant beyond words. The first “out” bi-senator and closeted Republican, according to Trevor Noah.

So any involvement between Sinema and anyone related to Gabbard, especially someone as close as a sister, is beyond weird. From The Daily Beast:

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ) spends more of her campaign funds on security than nearly every other member of Congress—she’s underwritten well over $560,000 for her protection since late 2021—but what’s more unusual than how much she spends is who she spends it on.

According to federal campaign finance filings, Sinema’s campaign committees have paid a combined $307,000 in security expenses to an Arizona-registered entity called TOA Group LLC.

And official documents show that TOA Group LLC has just one officer: Vrindivan Gabbard Bellord—best known as the sister of, and occasional spokesperson for, Tulsi Gabbard. She appears to have no other clients aside from the Arizona senator.

One has to read the entire article to get a sense of the convoluted nature of the relationship (And the money goes well beyond the direct payouts), and learn of Sinima and Gabbard’s history together as friends since they entered the House together in 2012. It is almost impossible to figure out what Sinema is really doing here beyond just shoveling money toward a friend (Who is a U.S. Marshall and thus has the experience to provide security, but she still has her government job, and Sinema is her only client.)

The most bothersome aspect to me, at least, again goes back to the fact that – without any evidence – it seems almost obvious that Gabbard is Putin’s puppet, whether she simply chooses to be or has been “asked” to be, I don’t know. But I’m hardly alone in suspecting that there is some Russian-Gabbard association of some type. Anything that involves impropriety around Gabbard deserves serious scrutiny, and this now brings Sinema front and center to have to explain herself a little bit more forthrightly. She is “weird” (in a political way) and there may be more to the story.
****
[email protected], @JasonMiciak, SUBSTACK: MUCH LEFT ADO

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.

Support the site with a subscription today and see no more ads!

Go Ad-free Now!

5 COMMENTS

  1. I’m confused. I need more details on all this. If Gabbard’s sister is (or has been) a U.S. Marshall then I agree there’s at least a set of qualifications to provide security. What we need to nail down is if Sinema’s consultant is STILL an active U.S. Marshall, AND collecting this kind of money. I know state and local LE have situations where they can apply for permission to do some moonlighting for extra money. However, they have to get formal permission, and I doubt any of them are going to get away with making that much money in that short a time. The rules for feds that carry a badge, and for federal employees in general that want to have outside work are different but I believe that permission can be obtained for secondary employment. However, a serving Marshall taking in several hundred grand in a short time frame for security of another federal employee that has another set of federal LE responsible for protection seems problematic at best.

    So the first question is whether Gabbard’s sister is still an active U.S. Marshall, or was at any point while making money consulting on security for Sinema. The second thing is whether any rules were broken, or laws for that matter. I do hope that this gets explored. I’d imagine Chuck Schumer will be having a chat with some folks about all this. It could get “interesting” to say the least.

  2. Senator Sinema is corrupt. There is no other correct way to describe her. She doesn’t give a damn for her constituents here in Arizona. She only cares about her corporate donors. They have given her a lot of money and she accepts it gladly. I want to get rid of her in 2024 when she is up for reelection. So do most Arizonans.

  3. This combined with all the recent Russia-gate stuff makes me wonder if Russia has spent many years cultivating people to be insider traitors who remain in their political jobs just as placeholders accumulating information, while playing the part as regular Americans spouting loyalty to the US. That is probably how it goes, and we might never know who is who until something a little ‘off’ happens & we start to wonder……… I guess this is how distrust starts to spread & with a recent VERY high level FBI officer getting outed as ‘selling his soul for cash’ it makes me worry about who can be trusted at all ! Now we are all waiting to see if the legal side actually do their jobs or do investigations mysteriously fade away ? I trust Jack Smith, but wonder about Chris Wray ! The whole Republican party appears to have been taken over by Russophiles ! How on earth did that happen so suddenly ? Answer – not sudden, they have been gradually doing their thing for many years !

  4. NOOOOO! Jason .. Gabbards are not Putins puppets they are Semion Mogilivech puppets via #NewZealand branch of RUSSIAN mob .. find and read #CitJourno @LincolnsBible @ninandtito and other. START WITH
    #PokeTheBear http://tinyurl.com/ybuk3z6v (LINK TO PAGE 1 of Chapter 1 THE STORY)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here