Jesus, Mary and Joseph. How can anybody be so dirt stupid, and yet pass a state bar exam? I can’t believe that Special Counsel Jack Smith wasn’t dancing an Irish jig when he read the ruling from Kindergarten Judge Aileen Cannon tossing the Mar-A-Slobo documents case by some convoluted logic that Smith was unconstitutionally appointed.
Man! Talk about grabbing the gold ring! Give Smith credit. He suffered through months and months of stupid and nonsensical rulings from Cannon on the simplest matters, for the simple reason that when he finally went before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to have Judge imposter Cannon recused, he wanted a guaranteed lock.
And now he has it. My personal gut feeling is that the Traffic Court Judge finally got tired of having sh*t shoveled all over her head by the media for being an imbecile puppet for Traitor Tot, and just finally decided to get out from under it once and for all. There’s just one small problem. She forgot that she isn’t the Supreme Court, and her last word isn’t the last word.
Cannon truly is a judicial imbecile. Not only is she bucking decades of established principle, she’s bucking decades of existing precedent! The Special Prosecutor/Special Counsel concept has been around so long that it was actually confirmed by the Supreme Court all the way back to the watergate scandal with Nixon.
It’s been around so long that there are already set-in-stone rules and regulations in appointing one! Trump himself took a hand in, along with Tubby the Ewok in appointing Special Counsels to investigate Hunter Biden, as well as the origins of the FBI investigation into the Trump-Russia connection. And while there were squeals of the politization of the DOJ, nobody went to court to bother to challenge the legitimacy of those Special Counsels. Simply because the rules were followed, exactly the way Merrick Garland did with Jack Smith.
Oh Lordy, Lordy, Lordy, I can’t wait for Smith’s filing before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to be posted and made public. Being a seasoned and experienced federal prosecutor, Smith will be careful to refrain from casting any aspersions to Cannon’s obvious bias in favor of Trump in dropping the charges.
Instead he’ll do something much more devious, and much more effective. He won’t just restrain himself to simply responding to Cannon’s imbecilic ruling on dropping the charges. No. I see Smith making a voluminous filing highlighting her dismissal of the charges, and then unload a whole litany of her every, single imbicelic ruling on all of the other ancillary motions he has had to swallow whole over these last months.
He’ll list every one, along with the rebutting precedent rulings that tear them to shreds, and then close with a powerful statement showing that while Judge Cannon may not be biased, she is certainly too inexperienced and incompetent to preside over a case with national security implications.
And it’s not like Jack Smith is in friendly territory here. The 11th Circuit is one of the more conservative appellate courts in the country. And when appellate courts do find it necessary to overturn a lower court ruling, there’s normally a certain delicacy in how their rulings are worded, in order to save the lower court judge any more embarrassment than necessary. But Cannon is such a judicial dunce that in both of the previous issues of her rulings that Smith brought before the court, both rulings absolutely excoriated Cannon, not only for her fuzzy and illogical reasoning in her rulings, but also for overstepping her judicial authority in even taking up those issues in the first place.
Jack Smith is like a spider. He waited until the fly got all of her legs stuck in the web before he saddled on out to wrap her up. Smith is almost certain to not only get Cannon’s imbecilic ruling overturned, but also for the 11th Circuit to recuse her from the case and hand it over to another, more experienced judge. After all, the judges on the 11th Circuit aren’t there to make a full time career of fixing Judge Cannon’s f*ck ups.
You want to see Traitor Tot modeling an orange jumpsuit? VOTE DEMOCRATIC! If Trump goes down in November, then he goes down in federal court in Florida in 2025. The Mar-A-Slobo documents case is the Manhattan DA fraud case on steroids. It is purely a documents case, and nothing in the SCOTUS ruling protects a private citizen from prosecution for unauthorized possession of classified documents. And on the upside? That trial will take place after Judge Chutkan is finished with his fat pasty ass. Good times a-coming.
I thank you for the privilege of your time.
I wondered if Jack was playing three dimensional chess while she’s still sorting out checkers. Now if the voters will get off their collective asses and go vote blue as if free phones were available, or it was shrimp day at Red Lobster, then we can all start to believe justice is a real possibility in America. I would love to see Musk watch a good chunk of his wealth disappear like a stupid whale at the blackjack table. Keep the hope coming Murf…it helps balance out the demon fest in Wisconsin.
I’m not on board with this line of thinking – yet! I believe cannon would not have done this if she didn’t have the backing of the supreme court. Just like everything else they’ve done to rule in orange jeebus’ favor, they will also rule WITH her on this, despite precedence. Or do something to kick it down the road for a few more months. But I don’t believe she wanted to be relieved. She was interviewing for a scotus position in dfg’s term. And she had the blessing of those above her in the judicial chain of command. That’s what I’m believing until it is proven otherwise. Sorry to disagree!
I think you are absolutely right. further, I think the current SCOTUS justices want to get rid of the Special Counsel possible positions anyway – and Thomas told Cannon how to tee it up for them Do you honestly think they will care that is has been used and Litigated since Nixon?? Get real. They respect NO precedent. So now, Smith will appeal to 11th circuit, they’ll side with Smith, then Trump will appeal to Supreme Court who will do what they wanted all along – get rid of all special counsels. Remember Chevron, and remember this is a court that wants all power to itself &
judiciary branch.
“… remember this is a court that wants all power to itself &
judiciary branch.”
This ^^^ is such a CRITICAL issue. And it has been completely missed in many analyses. In the immunity case, the SC essentially said, “The trial court should figure out what are “official acts” and get back to us to see if we agree, if not…???”
They’ve done the same in the case involving federal agencies, saying the courts will determine what used to be done by experts.
Well, in fairness, it is the job of the trial courts to determine facts presented in a case. Here. that requires the trial court to determine which acts at issue are official or unofficial. That’s the job of a trial court.
Remember that SCOTUS sent the other case back to Chairman to determine what acts were official and which weren’t. I don’t want to wade through it all. They set forth a general principle and that way they can have their cake and eat it too,by positioning themselves as above the political fray.
I too worry about this. We currently have six con xtians on the s.c. who are no longer deciding whether or not a law runs counter to an/their interpretation of the US Constitution, they are creating their own laws/amendments to the Constitution. The prez immunity decision is just their latest example but we’ve been seeing this behavior for a few years now. It would not surprise to see them reverse themselves on their own recent ruling f.f.s. I have gotten so used to them overturning precedent that I just expect it whenever they take a case. Now, this happens. Courts, norms, etc. change over time just as the constitution does although it’s changes are through the amendment process rather than by fiat. What DOESN’T happen, or rather hasn’t happened, is for s.c.’s to create new laws out of their own personal belief systems. What hasn’t happened is s.c. members not recusing themselves from cases involving people/corps/orgs which provided them financial benefits (I call this bribery).
I would hope the s.c. would not take this case-they have refused to take cases for von shitzinpants’ stolen election b.s. They don’t have to take it. If they do however I would make book, in fact I would bet the remaining years of my life, they will decide against the entire special counsel concept although how congress could make the law (s) any clearer is a mystery. It is as straight forward as it can get…or at least it is to people who have a minimal grasp of the english language.
I was wondering if this could be appealed and I’m glad it can and that dumb hooch didn’t completely blow this out of the water. Of course there are six dumb hooches on the s.c. so there is still the possibility of a yet another act of corruption on their part.
Yes, I think she desperately wanted out of this case because she knew she was in way over her head. Clarence Thomas tossed her a lifeline and she lunged at it. Which does raise the question of judicial coordination. Will both and Cannon and Thomas be gone next year? Biden will be making court reform a big issue in this election and Congress isn’t being shy about investigating him and his gift-givers. I suspect his opinion on Special Counsels may have been self-serving.
“Jesus, Mary and Joseph”???? Why not the three little bears ffs. Lost any credability with that ridiculous introduction.
Jury was raised Irish and Catholic. That stays with you. I had 17 years of Catholic education and it was good enough for me to turn down fellowships from two Ivies. I have been a Wiccan witch for 54 years now,but I still.hold doors for people. I still thank strangers for doing the same. Hell, my Mother at my age still muttered “Yes,S ‘Sister” if she encountered a nun. It is engrained.
And frankly, you sound like a right jerk. feel free to f**k right off. You won’t be missed. Bless your shriveled little lead picking heart.
Where’s my “Jesus, Mary and Joseph” comment, hmmm? Asshat
“Jesus, Mary and Joseph,” you are an absolute idiot.
We have a saying in the South that definitely applies: “Bless your heart.”
(That’s the sweet, grandmotherly way of saying, “Damn, that boy’s f*cking stupid. Forrest Gump’s got more brains in his little finger than Fred III has in his whole three selves.”)
THE JOB OF A TRIAL COURT IS TO DETERMINE THE FACTS PRESENTED IN ANY CASE. YOU WONT POST THAT COMMENTY? LOL. YOU ARE A JOKE
I CAN DO THIS ALL. DAY. LONG.
Of course you can Cheap.insults are easy.
You have no brain.
Yeah, I trust Murfster for keen insight. Lol Kys
I believe special counsel / prosecutor predates Watergate by about 100 years!
Cannon could have gotten out any time by citing conflict, but was probably too afraid of incurring the wrath of tRump / MAGA
I dont know where eople get this idea of her wanting to get out. She was as happy as a pig in shit.