The GOP is having issues with Judges in the courts, and you do not like it. Too many judges are going against the Mango Mandarin’s wishes, I see. So now you want to close the courts? Good grief, you’re excessive. I don’t think it will be as easy as you think it will. Ohhhh, your right flank is putting pressure on you. Now you make fractionally more sense. But still!
So, Mikey, you want to eliminate some federal courts. You’re probably feeling some pressure from Traitor Tot, too. And he goes to the Supreme Court to get what he wants, but what guarantees do you have that they’ll do what you want? Conservative court or no, you have a rather big chance they won’t rule the way you want. And sooner than later, they‘re going to get tired of the petty bullsh*t and send it back down to the federal courts anyhow. Plus, you have to get it through all of Congress, and that won’t be easy, either.
Hmmmm, and impeach judges, too, probably because they follow the law. The Orangutan thinks he *is* the law. Well, he’s not, and doing things that are blatantly unconstitutional means he’s going to get stopped, if at all possible. Let’s see who you are hating. Ah, here we go: “U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who attempted to halt Trump from using the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelan migrants.” All the dodging doesn’t mean he doesn’t know what the Justice Department is doing. He *does* know, and he wants answers! And now, by chance, he also has the case from SignalGate. Good times! There are at least 3 more going against you, Mikey, and His Lowness doesn’t like it. I’ll bet you can’t tell him he is NOT the law.
Here we go, have some more quotes from what I’m reading. “Attempts to defund courts will be a major flashpoint in bipartisan funding negotiations for the next fiscal year. But Republicans are a long way from making good on these threats.” “First, they would need to convince powerful senior appropriators to strip funding for certain courts in their funding bill, in this case, the Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill that funds the lower courts. But the appropriations subcommittee that oversees that funding bill is chaired by Rep. Dave Joyce, R-Ohio, a former prosecutor, self-described pragmatist, and one of the more moderate members of the House GOP conference.” That’s just the beginning. You haven’t gotten to the meat in this matter, and you’re going to have a good time trying to get there.
One more long quote. On top of that, House Republicans would need near-unanimous agreement to pass a funding bill that defunded some courts on the floor, which would be a difficult feat given their narrow majority. The Senate also would almost certainly reject any funding bill or package that defunded the courts. To pass it, Senate Republicans would need at least seven Democrats to join them to defeat a filibuster. And some Republicans might vote against such a proposal. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., said eliminating a district court would create “massive, massive backlogs.” My view is, I’d like to get more Republican judges on the bench,” Hawley said. “If we take away seats, we can’t do that.” Of all people, Josh Hawley. He’s the man who did a fist pump to the hordes of people shortly before the riot started. Yes, *that* Josh Hawley. Maybe the world is coming to an end for *him* to go against a bill.
That’s just an overview, Mikey. For one thing, don’t underestimate the *time* it will take to try and do this. There are many obstacles in your way, and Congress has many things to do that are more important. You might want to rethink this. Have fun, Mikey. You have a long road ahead of you.
*****And now, please read a very special request from our awesome boss******
Zoomers, if you can spare a donation, it will keep us trekking through cyberspace from planet to planet and psychotic news story to psychotic news story. We just need a little green energy to keep going on our (now) nine year mission, and who knows how long it will take to get rid of Trump? Thanks. Ursula
