Whatever else happens this year, it will be a stunning year for legal cases in Trump world. Cyrus Vance keeps plodding with his investigation, the State of New York has investigations into Trump ongoing, and now Rudy Giuliani may end up taking his disbarment issue to the United States Supreme Court. Or, at least this is the latest legal phantasm hatched in the brain of Alan Dershowitz.
Dershowitz has some cockamamie rationale that Giuliani lying about the election on Fox News and other outlets is a valid manifestation of free speech for a lawyer, analogous to the cheerleader who was allowed to swear off school grounds.
Alan Dershowitz is the supreme sophist of this or any other century. I hope he talks further about how Giuliani going on national television to lie about the election is protected free speech. This should be a real howler.
And why not get Giuliani’s disbarment before the highest court in the land? I mean, Mike Lindell is going to have SCOTUS create the legal mechanism of reinstatement out of whole cloth, right?
Somehow I think “Dersh” needs to start keeping an auto mechanic nearby. Pretty soon his head is going to do like Rudy’s and start leaking worn out transmission fluid!
He’s certainly lost tract of the laws in the last 10 years. Just what was he doing at those parties he was going to with Epstein and those other bigwigs?
Well, he claims as the young girl gave him a, “massage”, he kept his underwear on … correct me please, if I’m wrong on this … because I have NEVER found any underwear for sale without access to a junk yard built right in for natural daily life functions …
So maybe he was correct in that statement and she was still able to deliver her complete massage without interference … 🙂 🙂 /s
Does the S.C. have jurisdiction over a state’s professional licensing? I know they can say when licensing rules and regs oversteps (it was NC or SC I think who got their pee-pees slapped here several years ago), but when a professional violates the rules and regs the state has on the books, that’s a state S.C. matter I should think. When a professional obtains and keeps, for years, that professional license, they are agreeing to follow the laws that go with that license.
Not directly, and they don’t generally take cases that haven’t gone through appellate courts.