Ohhh folks, crossing fingers that you will come and read this. The new James Comey indictment is for something so foolish and First Amendment-protected that it’s ridiculous. Again, it’s because of a picture. A *picture*. But there’s more that has come out, and it’s beyond entertaining! With respect for Raw Story:
Former FBI Director James Comey was indicted for a second time on Monday — and this time, it’s unrelated to the previous, widely-criticized charge alleging that he lied to the Senate during testimony about the Russia investigation.
Instead, reported Fox News’ Bill Melugin, the new indictment is “in relation to his ‘8647’ seashell post on Instagram last year” — a post that at the time, a number of MAGA commentators claimed was a threat of or call for violence against President Donald Trump, the 47th president, even though the phrase “to 86 someone” can have a broad variety of meanings.
Alrighty, there’s your refresher and introduction. It gets better from here. All of us were aghast when they actually managed to indict him on that. There are a whole bunch of questions around it because it doesn’t make sense. And remember, Kra$h Patel opened his mouth and gave us information that was supposed to be sealed under grand jury secrecy. I still want to know why he made the announcement and not Blanche.
Legal and political observers on social media were quick to weigh in, broadly agreeing this indictment was a wild and unconstitutional abuse of power and would swiftly fall apart.
“If the charges are over alleged threats Comey made by posting ‘8647,’ that indictment is not long for this world,” wrote Lawfare’s Anna Bower.
“As Todd Blanche is well aware, 8647 is not even close to being a true threat. Not to mention that Comey said he didn’t know the phrase was associated with violence!”
Yes. We remember this. He thought the shells were pretty, so he took a picture on the beach. He had *no* idea what it could mean. When someone told him about it, he took it down. So, this court case is being held together by a very fine thread! Therefore, as Ms. Bower said, it’s not long for this world.
“You have got to be kidding me,” wrote The Bulwark’s Sam Stein.
“These guys would indict an actual ham sandwich if the ham said something rude about DJT,” wrote Wall Street Journal columnist Kyle Smith.
“This is so funny/stupid/corrupt/malicious that we have no choice but to do The Next Level pod live,” wrote former GOP operative Tim Miller.
“Kash Patel is about to arrest any bouncer who has ever banned him from a bar under this logic lmao,” wrote the Right Wing Cope account.
“The idea that ’86 47′ is not protected free speech is so insulting that a copy of the First Amendment in the National Archives spontaneously combusted upon the filing of this indictment,” wrote American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick.
“The Comey indictment isn’t an ‘uphill battle‘ for DOJ. It isn’t ‘questionable.’ It isn’t debatable,” wrote reporter Radley Balko. “It’s an insane abuse of power, and it isn’t remotely close.”
“Disbar these lawyers,” wrote Georgia law professor Anthony Michael Kreis.
In a separate article, which I vaguely recall, the lawyers who brought this could actually be disbarred. But aw, yea. I always have to save the best for last. I know we went over some old material at the beginning, but it was on the way to these comments, so a refresher was done to lead in. The comments had me occasionally giggling, so I thought it would be fun to share with you. A copy of the First Amendment spontaneously combusted. Ahahaha.
See you soon!
Friends, I know everybody begs you for money. I promise you that of all of the outlets bugging you for spare change, we are the smallest and the hardest working. We’re a bunch of old, disabled people, except one writer in his mid-50s. But the rest of us are in our sixties and seventies, and this is a labor of love. All we’re asking for is the ability to continue our quest to tell the truth about Trump and help ensure democracy survives. If you can help, please do. Thank you. Ursula
