Yes, he was his usual dickish self for a 60 Minutes interview. He’s forgotten how to do anything but attack. He wasn’t good at doing anything else, but now it’s come to this. If at first you don’t succeed, attack, attack again. He’s predictable. Anyone who interviews him has to be prepared for one of those coming up during the interview. My compliments to Raw Story:

Observers hit President Donald Trump with a brutal fact-check after he made a “clinical-grade” remark during his interview on “60 Minutes.”

Trump sat down for a one-on-one interview with Norah O’Donnell of CBS News on Sunday, just a day after an alleged shooter named Cole Allen opened fire during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

No one was killed during the event, and Allen was arrested by Secret Service agents, according to reports.

Seems all controlled and cool for this interview – so far. You have to know everyone was waiting for the explosion to come. Regrettably, most of the interview wasn’t covered in the article. It would have been something to hear his answers to other things. Was he already thinking he was insulted? Or did his addled brain think everything was fine and dandy, until…

During the interview, O’Donnell asked Trump about a part of Allen’s manifesto, which he sent to his family members ahead of the shooting,

where he said he was no longer willing to let “a pedophile, rapist, and traitor” continue to “coat [his] hands in crimes.”

Trump lashed out at O’Donnell for asking the question, arguing that he is not a rapist and calling her a “disgrace.”

Boom diddy boom. There we go. Was Ms. O’Donnell ready for it? Highly likely. She knows how defensive he can get with the things she asks about, and anything even remotely linked with the Epstein files. Such as … being a pedophile. We know he is. We’ve had survivors tell us about him. So yes, he’s going to be hyper sensitive about anything and everything related to the words pedophile and rapist. He doesn’t consider himself a traitor on January 6. He said the election was stolen because he couldn’t admit he lost. Now he’s back and making a gigantic, disgusting mess. And now we get to the fun parts!

Observers offered the president a swift fact-check on social media. //// “A jury and a judge adjudicated him as a rapist,” Norman Ornstein, a contributing editor at The Atlantic, posted on X.

“A woman credibly accused him of rape when she was 13. He bragged about walking into a dressing room with naked teenagers. He bragged about grabbing women by the p—-.”

 “Trump is a clinical-grade psychopath,” journalist Nancy Levine Sterns posted on X. //// “Trump is literally a court adjudicated rapist,” novelist Patrick S. Tomlinson posted on X.

“Wow. This interview was epic. Trump’s nastiness and consciousness of guilt were off the f—— charts” podcaster Andy Ostroy posted on X.

In 2023, a jury found Trump liable in a civil sexual abuse and defamation case filed by E. Jean Carroll. A judge later clarified that the jury’s guilty verdict meant Trump had been found liable for rape, the Washington Post reported at the time.

Liable for rape. Known pedophile for one survivor and possibly more. And this man is our (_*&#@$&#$^&_$#+}! ‘president’. That’s only what we know thus far. The DoJ continues to drag its feet on the remaining half that haven’t been published yet, which they are required to do by law. What is it going to take to get those out here? Or are the 1,000 FBI agents still redacting Trump? They sure as hell aren’t redacting survivors. We wait.

Apologies for the ranting. This, with the Epstein files, is near and dear to my heart. I get carried away.

See you soon!

Friends, I know everybody begs you for money. I promise you that of all of the outlets bugging you for spare change, we are the smallest and the hardest working. We’re a bunch of old, disabled people, except one writer in his mid-50s. But the rest of us are in our sixties and seventies, and this is a labor of love. All we’re asking for is the ability to continue our quest to tell the truth about Trump and help ensure democracy survives. If you can help, please do. Thank you. Ursula

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.

Support the site with a subscription today and see no more ads!

Go Ad-free Now!

4 COMMENTS

    • He doesn’t even deserve the title of “Mr.”. When he said Nora O’Donnell was ‘horrible people’, what he meant was ‘I’m a horrible person.’ Somebody, Congress, anybody, figure out a way to get rid of him. We’ll probably have to wait for voters to do it.

      • Yea, it’s probably going to wait until after midterms. That part suck, because Congress obviously isn’t going to do it right now, even if many people *in* Congress are thinking about it. His cabinet is hopeless.

    • I don’t see how SCOTUS could do anything without causing a huge outcry. Everyone knows about it already and it would be obvious SCOTUS is doing it for Trump. That would make one all-fired mess.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here