So coming on the heels of a sweeping victory of a magnitude that few considered even possible, President-elect Donald Trump has reason to be celebratory and confident. And yet, according to a new article in The Washington Post, it would seem that the transition team forgot who they worked for, and his unique management style – putting it somewhat mildly – along the way. The team hand selected and vetted a number of candidates for the top positions in the administration and seem shocked, shocked I tell you, that Donald Trump will do what he wants, when he wants it, which is what his supporters love in the first place, and yet this quality now apparently beguiles those closest to him. Now they find themselves in each others’ way, unsure how to go forward. Sound familiar?
Despite the fact that Trump was always going to follow his gut despite the best made plans around him, unforced political errors are popping up and his extremely well-paid staff is evidently unequipped to keep up. The two biggest issues are – again, surprise – nominating Matt Gaetz and Peter Hegswseth to the Justice Department and Defense. According to the WaPo:
The transition has properly vetted some potential nominees, but Trump has also been operating off his own script with many of his personnel choices — choosing unvetted candidates and acting outside the transition structure in a way that has immediately created serious political challenges, according to interviews with 18 people involved, most of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak frankly. The president-elect has been largely unfazed, ebullient and soaking in his win on the Mar-a-Lago patio.”
Yes, so? Again, did they expect anything else? And if they did – and it sure sounds like it – then perhaps they shouldn’t have been working for the man. Their time might have been better spent with less vetting and more preparation for surprising and problematic choices, sort of a “team red ready-alert” mechanism that would break down different issues in different order, pre-assigned, pre-loaded. Alas, these are the type of things that get in his way. Democrats are the ones who believe this to be his greatest asset.
If indeed Project 2025 was planned so thoroughly, it might well be that a lot of people got very rich off raising money from Trump’s supporters only to then find themselves on the outside looking in with respect to power and his normal operating procedure. They are having trouble keeping up, so where did all that money go?
“But some of those people brought baggage. Senior transition officials have grown concerned about the confirmation process for both Gaetz and Pete Hegseth, Trump’s nominee to be defense secretary, four people close to Trump said. But Trump made clear he was not inclined to withdraw either selection, convinced that the incoming Republican-controlled Senate would support them, people close to him said.”
Maybe so. But then why didn’t they ask Trump to make his picks prior to the win? They could have avoided a lot of these problems. And if they didn’t try, it goes back to what it was they were doing besides cashing massive checks. If these fights were inevitable, then have them behind closed doors and pound it out beforehand so as to emerge with one voice, ready to go on the ground afterward. It doesn’t take political genius to say earlier on: “Whatever we do, the controversial stuff better be worked out before, inside, so that we’re all on the same page when we climb that mountain.”
It is not like it would’ve all taken too much time. He sure hasn’t needed much afterward. And, it’s hardly a huge surprise that he won – some of us knew that the election was always 50-50 at best, no matter how joyous some of the polls might have been. How much work would it have taken to make these calls beforehand? If those choices weren’t even considered, it goes back to why they were paid so much money. Or, was that the point in the first place? To keep the money flowing well-afterward? His original administration suffered from the same pattern, never getting everyone pulling together.
This is especially concerning given the dynamic where the Steve Bannon and Kash Patel types are highlighting the desire to “break things” as the only way forward. But has anyone actually checked with whether Donald Trump believes the same? It may well be that he fully knows he will be the one running things from the top and yet wants something there to actually run! Breaking everything seems to ensure that this exact type of problem, people underneath fighting for power, are the ones making decisions even prior to running it before the soon to be boss.
If there is one thing everyone knows, the quickest way to the door is to set about implementing a project that is more near and dear to – perhaps – Steven Bannon’s heart (As just an example) and not fully run by Trump himself. Because it is when Trump sets about to attempt to initiate his plans – only to find them already subsumed in another’s agenda, that things get real bad real fast. Such a context is the surest way to finding something broken, but then be a harder fix under any plan.
I suspect that those folks who are already partying about Project 2025 were more focused on what they want, which includes their unique agenda – along with spending a ton of that pile of green raised – prior to even checking with the only opinion that matters – Donald Trump, who was busy campaigning. It certainly fits the pattern with respect to the nominees.
Dunno, but they might want to check all those plans out before him – first, especially in the near future, all to make sure that the “best laid plans” are actually his plans before rolling it all out. If for no other reason than there is always another consideration…
He hates it when others use up a bunch of his money that he primarily collected. No wonder there is some real worry on the ground floors at Mar-a-Lago. More than a few will have to account for how much money went where prior to even presenting the plans they were paid to make.
God Bless:Â I can be reached at [email protected] and @JasonMiciak






















Jason, are you trying to give Donald Trump advice? Would you give Jesus advice? Why don’t you just let Trump be Trump, describe what’s happening, and watch his whole administration turn to shit just like happens with everything else he does. Not really good for the country, but better than if he actually had his act together, which for Trump, as we’ve had much opportunity to witness, is just not gonna happen. Just remember this simple maxim, it never fails: Everything Trump touches dies. I am not referring to America here, I’m referring to the burgeoning Trump maladministration aka clown show.
Eh, I don’t think that’s anywhere even near advice. I think that’s pretty straightfoward observational stuff. To the exten that I say “they should do this… ” it is mostly just noting what I consider obvious.
And, FWIW, I do happen to think that there are a lot darker and more dangerous folks just lurking below. Not saying that any of it is okay, just noting that this is a dicey time. To say the least.
But no. I will look at how I’m writing it in the future. It is not like any of them are going to take anyone’s advice, least of all mine. But I guess it can sound like that.
Mostly I am trying to stay sane. It is hard to write about now and I’m just trying to put things more straightfowardly for now. I think everyone better take a breath. I’m trying to stay a bit grounded, to take care of my daughter, not get lost in it all.
jason
“So coming on the heels of the most sweeping electoral mandate seen since Reagan”
What alternative universe does this come from? He’s now under 50% of the votes counted, (with counting still continuing.)
And in the Electoral College
Harris vs Trump 226/324
Biden vs Trump 306/232
Clinton vs Trump 227/304
Obama vs Romney 332/206
Obama vs McCain 356/173
Kerry vs Bush 251/286
Gore vs Bush 269/271
Clinton vs Dole 379/159
Clinton vs Bush 370/168
He’s still behind Obama and B. Clinton, a long way from Reagan.
Yes, hes got the Senate, and Congress, (Congress, barely) but he had that last time he got in and couldn’t do anything with it.
Please don’t contribute to the narrative pushed by republicans that he has a huge mandate, a decisive landslide win.
He doesn’t, they don’t.
Donald Trump is the 2nd Republican since 1988 to win the popular vote and he did so easily. He won all seven swing states. In this 50-50 context (This is not even 2008) that equates to what is a mandate. The Senate flipped hard and fast. Those are just the facts. If you disagree with the word “mandate” – then I can respect that. But the win was overwhelming and that, again, is just sort of a fact. I suspect it’s best to deal with it as is.
jason
your definition of ‘overwhelming’ does not match reality.
I think it is the word that is the problem. It was a wave election of the type of that few even thought possible. I would put to you that if we flipped “Ds” and “Rs” then people would have no problem with the word.
I do respect that the word can mean different things to different people and have different connotations. I might have used something different if I were to write it again. But we all saw what happened and the margin of victory, so we can probably come together on an appropriate description. Do you have a suggestion?
jason
I would suggest the word “failure” to cover the fact that about 15 million Democratic voters didn’t turn out…..
I have to respectfully but strongly disagree with use of the term “mandate.” By next month when all the votes are counted (again, WTF California? Why haven’t you fixed your shiite?) Trump will have about a 2 percent win in the popular vote. Solid and undeniable but hardly a mandate. Democrats have assumed the Presidency in the past few decades with far larger popular vote margins and the GOP has HOWLED at any mention of the word “mandate.” Please keep that in mind.
As for over on Capitol Hill. The Senate map strongly favored the GOP this cycle. And the plain fact is that they have a build in advantage when it comes to the Senate due to geography. All those ruby red states that are relatively low in population. Republicans have and will continue to have an outsized advantage in the Senate unless the Constitution is amended. That’s not going to happen.
Over in the House for the second election in a row the GOP has a razor thin majority. If not for gerrymandering including some pretty extreme version (I live in NC – one of the worst) they wouldn’t have had the majority the past two years or in the next Congress. That’s hardly a “mandate.”
This country is divided almost 50-50. Mandate? No way. Trump won and thanks to an accident of geography and a Constitutional quirk the GOP has a decent advantage in the Senate. They can lose a vote or two here and there but they aren’t SOLIDLY in control either. Especially with McConnell no longer in charge. The House will continue to be a cluster f**k and who knows? We might get a crack at one more free and fair election in 2026 and I’m betting GOPers who are thinking they can act like they’ve gotten some mandate will find themselves in for a rude awakening. Maybe not at 2018 level but a butt-kicking nonethless.
A free and fair 2026 election depends upon Project 2025 NOT being implemented…..
And the odds that it will NOT be seem dim, unfortunately.
Anything other than a surprise sting with mass arrests of the Trumpsurrectionists (who’ve now ‘successfully’ completed their criminal conspiracy) by the Biden/Garland DOJ before year’s end will make me think other-wise, not that I’m holding my breath for THAT to happen…
Barely winning is not ‘having a mandate’. It means barely winning, specially with LESS THAN 50% of the popular vote – which equates to about 1/3 of the electorate.
Specially when you consider the gerrymandering the republicans practice everywhere they can, indeed it appears to be the only thing they’re good at building up.
I changed the word from “mandate” bc it was to strong and didn’t add a thing to the article.
I would ask people to consider how they would characterize the matter if Harris had carried all 7 swing states without even the need for a recount. It would be hailed as an overwhelming show of support and rejection of Trump.
It is something that needs to be considered. Meanwhile, I think grasping for sanity is in order.
jason
Thanks for acting on the criticism, Jason.
GOP: Grifters’ & Opportunists’ Party.
“But then why didn’t they ask Trump to make his picks prior to the win?”
Apparently he’s too superstitious to do that.
And some more, from CNN.
Trump’s mandate? It’s very shallow. Trump’s now under 50% in the popular vote.
His margin ranks 44 of 51 since 1824.
Weak coattails: 4 Dems won for Senate in states Trump won. (It was 0 in 2016 & 2020.)
The GOP is on track for smallest House majority since there were 50 states.