Another 4th of July, another time to check in with that constitutional scholar, Lauren Boebert, about how our country came to be and what all those documents that we refer to on a day like today actually mean. Boebert was photographed with a goat today. We presume she’s trying to save it from the rifle of Kristi Noem. Or, maybe she agrees with Kristi and the goat is soon to be history. Bobo has a somewhat tortured past in citing historical facts. But hey, her teeth gleam and she’s photogenic and what do you want or expect in a Republican legislator, particularly a woman?

Well, it’s evolving, sorta kinda maybe, when it suits her purpose. And here are some other memorable moments when Bobo holds forth on matters historic.

That bottom clip is a bonus one. It makes about as much sense as the top one does. And this is but a glimpse, a mere appetizer, of the rest of the historical feast which Bobo has in store for our consumption.

Bobo has an answer for that. Yes, she does. It’s all a question of which “version” of the Declaration you read. Whut? Oh yes. Listen and learn, oh ye of little faith.

See, this politicking thingy is not all that complex: all you have to do is 1. Look good; 2. Mouth the right MAGA dogma; 3. look good, and this is important, 4. Never ever step outside the realm of MAGA shows or right-wing media, because anybody objective (or at least minimally informed) will nail you each and every time. But bottom line, you have to look good. Once you have that down, you have to really eff up bigly in order to lose your seat in Congress. (Hey, Madison, we’re talking to you, dude. Maybe Beetlejuice will still be her undoing, who knows?) If Colorado sends her back to Congress again, I am going to have a serious crisis of faith regarding both my home state and America, generally speaking. Hopefully, Bobo will wash out to sea along with Donald Trump.

 

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.

Support the site with a subscription today and see no more ads!

Go Ad-free Now!

2 COMMENTS

  1. hmmmm, I’m not sure the cons on the s.c. legislating from the bench could be considered a case of the constitution evolving-merely the s.c. illegally taking over the duties of congress. That’s probably why the nit-witted tw*t is ok with it: she’s pretty tight with a lot of criminals.

  2. Lauren boobert…the only thing ‘evolving’ is your moronic stupidity. Don’t worry…you spit in the face of the founders every phucking time you open your cakehole. Go put it to better use…giving blow jobs to men in the back of the theater.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here