“Supreme” Court? More Like Supreme “Court Jesters”

Well, it’s now official. The most corrupt, illegitimate Supreme Court in US History is now official, they’ve dropped all pretenses of being fair and impartial. You can always tell when their own decisions are conflicting with each other, and they just don’t give a sh*t.

How illegitimate are these five Times Square pimps? So illegitimate that the newest, and in some ways most illegitimate of them, rammed through by Grand Master Pimp McConnell when people were already voting, had to split from the Five Horsemen of the Porkopolis and tell them that they were going way overboard.

How illegitimate and corrupt are they? Well, I think we could safely start to call the Supreme Court Supreme Court LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Leonard Leo LLC, and The Federalist Society Consulting Company. My prediction is that by the time the fall session of the Supreme Court starts, the the six GOP bimbos will come out with corporate sponsor logos stitched to their robes, like NASCAR drivers.

They’re not even trying to pretend anymore. Thanks to NYU law professor Melissa Murray on MSNBC, we now know that after the Civil War, the Supreme Court, when called upon, it stood on its hind legs to minimize the ability of the congress to enact laws dealing with the Reconstruction Amendments, preferring to give the racist, seditionist southern states the maximum leverage in deciding how to apply the laws in their states. And now when it’s convenient, these five pendejo jerk-offs want congress to pass a law for determining how to deal with the sedition clause of the 14th Amendment!

Now, before we go any further, please strap on your moron deflector shields, and set them to full repulse. If you don’t, I’m afraid you might not make it through the next paragraph without falling to the floor and starting to foam from the mouth.

In their ruling today, the Supreme court wants the congress to pass a law mandating how the 14th Amendment is administered, using a previous Amendment to hang their hats on. Which begs the simple question, What the f*ck  do you think a constitutional amendment is? 

What is a Constitutional Amendment anyway? Quick hint. It’s a law on steroids. During Reconstruction, long after the Amendment the GOP majority hung their hats on, the congress passed a law. It stated that anyone who took part in, or aided and abetted an insurrection was ineligible to hold responsible government office. Then they sent that law to every state in the Union for them to confirm it, requiring a 2/3 majority of states to approve it to enshrine it in the constitution.

Which happened. And the 14th Amendment was created. And now the five GOP pimps, in their felt fedoras, and their pimp heels under their robes are coming off like some kind of a 2nd grade teacher reviewing homework, telling the congress, No, no, no, that’s not what I meant. Now go back home and do it all over again!

But there’s a separate issue at stake here, and I don’t think that it’s getting the interest and appreciation it deserves. You know, there’s a really good reason why Supreme Court justices write affirming of dissenting opinions to augment the actual majority opinion that decides the case. And that’s because they want those opinions to leave their footprint in judicial history. Normally history starts to be judged 20-30 years after the events in question.

Which is why, when former Trump Attorney General Tubby the Ewok was asked if he wasn’t worried that his almost BDSM pandering and subservience to Trump would tarnish his reputation in history, Barr snidely retorted, What do I care? I’ll be dead. Which to me is the ultimate of self entitled pecksniffery. What do I care if my children and grandchildren are humiliated by my actions, I won’t be around. 

But it seems lately that Barr has reconsidered that timeline, since he’s now on a nonstop PR rehabilitation tour to make himself something less of an *sshole. I think I know why he’s doing it, and I wish him a long and healthy retirement, with decades with his family that he so gleefully threw under the bus.

Throughout the trials and travails of Trump trying to get his Supreme Court to give him a get-out-of-jail-free-card, the media and legal analysts have been gleefully pointing out how the Supreme Court can move at warp speed when it wants to, but it’s not doing that with Trump’s bullsh*t.

Here’s why that’s important. After leaving office, in a rare moment of candid honestly, Trump admitted that his greatest wish when historians looked back on his presidency was that he not be as pathetic of a loser as former President Herbert Hoover. This is an enlightening statement, simply because it shows that down deep, Trump knows he was a pathetic loser, and just hoped that history wouldn’t judge him as even more feckless and worthless than Hoover.

Panic Alert for John Roberts, Sam Alito, Clarence Thomas, Donald Trump, William Barr, and several other brainless Trump acolytes. History can also work at warp speed when it wants to, and your precious reputations may well not be secure until long after you’ve accepted you invitation to the international dirt surfing competition. Y’all may just end up with sh*t all over your funereal suits.

The problem for the Trump Crime Family is that most President’s and administrations tend to follow a predictable course. And so it’s only after a couple of decades that historians can, allowing decisions made to come to their fruition, start to rate a presidency. Then evaluate the subtle nuances of the effects of those decisions on world views and events.

Not so with the Traitor Tot presidency. Those four years were nothing more or less than a total train wreck sh*t show. Historians don’t have to wait decades for the finer nuances of Trump’s decisions to play out. But with El Pendejo Presidente almost every decision was by nature a self fulfilling prophesy, matching Trump’s momentary existence. And the same thing goes for pretty much everybody in Trump’s orbit. There were no deeper meaning to their transitional decisions. Little research is needed.

And as a result, only three years after leaving office, in an official ranking of every President in US history, historians placed Trump firmly below Herbert Hoover as the worst President in US history. For the simple reason that his decisions were so immediately consequential that little historical perspective was needed. The official verdict was swift and conclusive, Trump sucked!

And the same thing is also going to happen over the next couple of years to Tubby the Ewok, and more importantly to John Roberts and his Court Jesters. For the same simple reason. Because their decisions and rulings were so over the top, so immediately consequential that historians don’t have to wait decades for the finer points of their decisions to come to light. As befitting a carnival of imbeciles, the Roberts court has no deep thinking, subliminal legal points that like wine, take time to breathe. They’re a sledgehammer, meant only to cause destruction. The first lasting legacy of the Roberts court will be the first one to ever strip away 50 years of constitutional rights.

Mark my words people. The Trump debacle was just too rich a fertile field, with almost no subliminal or cranially rich details to go through. Everything is exactly what it appears to be. And sweet Jesus, just look at the number of bestselling non fiction books written by journalists closely covering Trump, published even before he left office.

Legitimate historians have an actual cornucopia of publicly verified information to use when evaluating the Trump presidency. And the same thing goes for the Roberts Supreme Court. Their written decisions are so fact and legal precedent free that it doesn’t take a masters in law degree to see how politically and ideologically motivated their rulings are.

Thanks to incredible investigative reporting, historians working on a book about Clarence Thomas now have a wellspring of dirty underhanded financial dealings. They have documentary evidence of his wife’s perverse influence on Trump’s Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in the ls up to, and execution of the January 6th insurrection. The same comparisons can be made with the serpentine dealings of Sleazy Sam Alito.

In national and international affairs, it normally takes decades for the subtleties of an administrations decisions to become clear. But there were no subtleties to the Trump presidency, and no subtleties to the decisions of the Roberts Supreme Court. And I’d bet my left nut that there are some very reputable historians out there who mare already hard at work on deep dive exclusives. There may be a couple of extremely arrogant Supreme Court justices out there who are about to have a shole sh*tload of their dirty laundry show up in print. L’Chaim!

I thank you for the privilege of your time.