Former Public Editor of The New York Times Margaret Sullivan knows that there is much more at stake in this year’s Presidential Election than the traditional horse-race between two candidates of parties that differ profoundly on the role that the Federal Government should play in the lives and fortunes of it’s citizens, but instead contests the continued existence of democracy – and she wishes media would focus on that important aspect of the race.

Sullivan takes to the pages of The Guardian today to remind her fellow journalists that while Biden’s speech is a kickoff for his 2024 campaign, his candidacy is less about who will occupy the Oval Office in 2025 but whether our right to choose who will govern us will continue to exist at all.

“When Joe Biden talks on Saturday about US democracy on the brink, there’s no doubt that it will be a campaign speech. Maybe the most important one of his life.

But the speech will be more than that. It’s intended as a warning and a red alert, delivered on the anniversary of the violent January 6 insurrection at the Capitol.

The date was chosen for good reason – to make the point that more mayhem and more flagrant disregard for the rule of law and fair elections, are just around the corner if Donald Trump is re-elected.

Can the political media in America get that reality across? Or will their addiction to “horserace” coverage prevail?

So far, the signs aren’t particularly promising.”

Ms. Sullivan the contrasts headlines from CNN and USA Today to make her point.

While CNN coverage of the speech opens with the horse-race aspect… “Biden Opens Campaign Push”… USA Today chose to emphasize the existential nature of the coming campaign – “Biden will mark Jan. 6 anniversary with speech warning Trump is a threat to democracy.”

Sullivan than quotes Biden Campaign Manager Julia Chavez Rodriguez on why it is so important that the press should continue to frame the contest as a struggle between authoritarian and democratic principals:

“The choice for voters,” Rodriguez said, “will not simply be between competing philosophies of government. The choice will be about protecting our democracy and every American’s fundamental freedom.”

Before returning sum up the core of our current predicament, a media that Republicans have cowed into submission:

“That’s where the media gets tripped up. In a constant show of performative neutrality, journalists tend to equalize the unequal, taking coverage down the middle even though that’s not where true fairness lies.“

Sullivan then ends with a flourish, quoting former Washington Post executive editor Martin Baron‘s decidedly non-neutral take on Trump and on the coming contest:

“He’s the only politician I’ve heard actually talk about suspending the constitution. He’s talked about using the military to suppress entirely legitimate protests using the Insurrection Act. He’s talked about bringing treason charges against the then-outgoing chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. He’s talked about bringing treason charges against Comcast, the owner of NBC and MSNBC. He’s talked explicitly about weaponizing the government against his political enemies. And, of course, he continues to talk about crushing an independent press.”

Sullivan and Baron are exactly right in framing this year’s election not as a contest between two candidates with differing ideas about how democracies should function, but rather about two candidates who do not agree that American Democracy should continue to exist at all.

Media that does not clearly address that fundamental question should not be taken seriously.

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.


  1. Amen brother! I’ve long been disgusted by news outlet’s addiction to “horse-race” coverage, and when not engaging in THAT crap doing the “look at this shiny object!” nonsense – focusing on some irrelevant gaffe. ANYTHING to avoid discussing actual issues. What the bosses (and most of the “talent” too for that matter) think will bore the public. And to a degree they might be right about that. Jerry Springer himself expresses strong regrets over the “Springerization” of public discourse and especially the news. Offering compelling, informative and therefore meaningful and useful news is hard work. Greedy, lazy assed journalists are mostly happy to follow marching orders from the bosses to focus on “conflict” because sadly, they know it sells. It’s all about money in the end as in more in THEIR bank accounts and if the country (and the world) get f**ked in the process so be it. As former CBS head Les Moonves famously said of Trump back in 2016 “It may be bad for American but it’s good for CBS.”

    He was speaking for all of the news business!

    You know what? The folks in the executive suites and boardrooms, as well as the top “talent” don’t give a flying f**k if Trump shuts down independent news as we’ve known it and makes Fox official “State TV.” They’ve got millions stashed away and can simply move somewhere and enjoy the rest of their lives on their ill gotten gains.

  2. How much more effort would it take to write a meaningful NEWS piece? Most MSM is full of opinion pieces, many if not most of which should be the news!

  3. It’s funny, just the other day, Jan 3rd, I posted this comment on

    “Yeah, let’s ignore the huge achievements of Biden and turn it into a horse race with Trump.

    They’re both politicians, right?, and they both say things so they must be the same right?

    And following on from Trump’s blathering, ‘They both have legal troubles’

    Oh, so hard to choose. Who will win between these two nearly identical characters?

    That’s the trick they’re trying. On one side, competence, legality, honesty, democracy and fairness, on the other lies, fraud, treason, dishonesty, spin, fascism, no more democracy and ineptitude and incompetence.

    Are THAT many people going to think it’s a ‘toss the coin’ choice, or not?”

    followed by,

    “It’s not (just) the voting public. It’s the media who should be informing them, who’ve chosen not to report facts but, instead, to turn the election into a ‘race’ between ‘two contenders’ because they think that way they’ll get better ratings/more money.

    And if democracy is harmed? They don’t care, they got their money.”

    It’s good to know that others are thinking the same thing.

    Maybe if enough people notice, something might get done to fix it?

  4. How many autocracys have strong economy’s? If Trump wins and turns th US into a fascist dictatorship all business will be down the toilet and that money will be worthless. And as with the Russian oligarchs and business leaders wherever they go in the world. for the rest of their lives, they will have to avoid windows in high buildings.

  5. You would think that journalists at the few remaining actual newspapers and on the networks would grasp that if Donnie wins, their @$$es will high on his list of enemies and they’ll find themselves in the reeducation camps or worse. He has made it plain that any media,source that doesn’t kiss his pasty Rose is an enemy.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here