I swear, this is going to get good, and not too long from now. I have written previously that the MAGA GOP House crowd, as well as Trump’s advisors and butt boys went into this feeling bulletproof. They were 100% sure that one way or another Trump would win. And even after he lost, they still felt bulletproof, like Trump had some magic shield that would protect them.
Today, the J6 Committee released the contents of 3 letters sent to 3 sitting GOP members of the House, Andy Biggs, Mo Brooks, and Trump’s former presidential personal physician, Ronnie Jackson. The letters are detailed, and specific about the issues they want each witness to testify too, and of course, all three tossed the committee double barrel birds, in language crafted for email donation blasts.
These three bottom feeders are feeling cocky, and with good reason. After all, it’s been more than 2 months now since the House sent a Contempt of Congress citation to the DOJ for Mark Meadow’s refusal to cooperate with a subpoena. And so far, crickets. These ass gaskets all know that they can blow off the committee, forcing a House vote on contempt charges, and then wait out the DOJ.
They can do this for one reason. Because they know that time, and the federal court system is on their side. The J6 committee is under a timeline here, they have to hold the public hearings over the summer, and release a final report by no later than November, just in case the GOP retakes the House, and disbands the committee. They can just go to court, and like Traitor Tot, run out the clock.
But there’s one thing that these dimjobs are missing. While the J6 committee may be running up against a November deadline, the Department of Justice sure as hell isn’t. Because many of the things that the J6 committee have uncovered have criminal potential, and you can bet your ass that the committee will forward all of their relevant evidence to the DOJ, along with any recommended criminal referrals.
The problem for the House committee is that they issue a subpoena, and a witness blows them off, they have no self policing powers to force compliance. Instead, they have to hold a House vote to hold the witness in contempt, forward it to the DOK, and pray that they take action.
Everybody has been jumping AG Merrick Garland’s shit for his delay in filing an indictment against Mark Meadows in response to the House’s referral. I’m cutting him some slack. Because we already know that the DOJ has opened their own criminal investigation, and empaneled a grand jury for said purpose. And if you’re in the FBI or DOJ, and you have a subject in your sights, the last thing you want to do is to make him go to ground and lawyer up by tipping your mitts with a cupcake charge. Keep digging, and pounce when you’re ready.
Look, the DOJ is not going to indict Biggs, Brooks or Jackson for contempt of congress, nor should they. Because the J6 Committee may have to wrap this up by November, the DOJ is going to have until late 2025 or early 2026 before they hit the stale date.
Let these ass wipes high five each other over having gotten away with it when the commission releases its final report. And then, 8-12 months from now, issue DOJ subpoenas for testimony. That’ll be a cold water douche. Because the DOJ isn’t the US House. Fuck with a DOJ subpoena, and you’re gonna find yourself in court on criminal contempt charges, which will jail you until you comply with the subpoena. And that brings a whole new meaning to the phrase The Hurt Locker.
I’m 65 years old, but even I can appreciate the Chinese philosophy of looking at things in the long term. And while the J6 committee findings may have to be published in the short term, the DOJ criminal investigation into this conspiracy will continue long after we’ve forgotten the J6 findings. Keep punching, and keep the faith.






















I’m not sure but I do believe that Pelosi could get the House Sergeant-at-Arms to prevent the three from entering the House.
How can any SITTING member of the House of Representatives be permitted to take his or her seat when they’re under a CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS citation?