“No collusion” my *ss. Study indicates Russian trolls pushed Trump’s poll numbers.

0
320

Well, you sure as hell won’t hear this one being nattered over on the Fox and Friends comfy couch any morning in the foreseeable future. Axios is reporting that a newly released study shows a direct correlation between Russian troll Twitter activity and Trump’s poll numbers during the 2016 election cycle.

The study, which was conducted by the University of Tennessee-Knoxville, and published in the University of Illinois “First Monday”magazine shows that, despite frequent baa-baa-baa’s from Glorious Bleater, there is a direct correlation between Russian Twitter troll activity in 2016, and a rise in Trump’s poll numbers.

The study was quick to point out that a correlation does not necessarily result in a causation. basically meaning that an increase in Russian troll tweets about a Trump comment causing a spike in polling does not necessarily prove that the troll tweeting caused the spike. Outside factors such as Trump’s comment going viral could also account for the spike. But, seeing as the study looked at over 770,000 Russian troll tweets, the inference is pretty clear.

Basically, the poll looked at particular tweets from Russian bots on a variety of topics, and then checked the number of retweets, and compared it to pre and post tweet polling data available on 538.com. The study came away with four basic findings;

  • Every 25,000 retweets of Russian accounts correlated to a 1% increase in Trump’s poll numbers one week later.

  • Given the frequency of tweets from Russian accounts, 25,000 retweets would average around 10 retweets per tweet.

  • Retweets did not have a similar effect on Hillary Clinton’s poll numbers.

  • The study also found that 91% of first retweeters of known Russian bots were non-Russian bots, “which suggests that propaganda spread into networks of real U.S. citizens.”

My biggest takeaways from those four conclusions, and damning ones they are, is this. If you combine the first two points together, based on 10 retweets per Russian bot tweet, it only took 2,500 Russian tweets to equal 25,000 retweets, which correlated to a 1 point spike for Trump in the polls. Obviously there is no way to gauge the longevity of the polling bounce. Second, the fact that Hillary Clinton received no similar bounce from retweets goes to show how willing Trump supporters were to believe Russian troll bullshit. And third, the fact that 91% of Russian bot first retweets were from non Russian bots indicates how deeply Russian bots penetrated into conservative American social media.

The study I’d give my left nut to see would be the one that looks at how many of those retweets were in those so precious micro targeted districts that Trump won to carry the electoral college, after the date that American traitor Paul Manafort gave that internal Trump campaign polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik. Now that would be a study I’d frame and hang on the living room wall!

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.

Support the site with a subscription today and see no more ads!

Go Ad-free Now!

1 COMMENT

  1. Agreed. Your left-nut study would be a stunner. I wonder if it’s possible to do–that is, if that data is retrievable–and, if so, if it’s being done.

    • Considering the fact that you can track your ancestors all the way back to the Olduvai Gorge online, I can’t see how the technology wouldn’t be there…

      • A slight exaggeration: you can, for sure, get to Chrlemagne’s grandparents. But there’s no solid data from earlier than that, for Europeans, and the Chinese data isn’t all that reliable.

  2. Wow…this came from UT Knoxville, which is usually only known for football in my part of the world? And here I thought that my state currently had nothing worthwhile to share with the rest of the planet.

      • I’ve never seen “2001”, but I’ve read the novelization … and I read Mad’s parody, “201 Minutes of a Space idiocy”. Mad’s version was *much* easier to follow.

        • In my younger days, I’d usually read the parody from Mad first before seeing the movie. The one for Robocop had gags I still laugh about: “My nose is running…all over my face.”

          • If you can find it online, get yourself a copy of “Bored of the Rings.” It’s by the Harvard lampoon, and I think it’s quite probably the funniest takedown of a serious book that I’ve ever read!!!

        • Granted…Actually, Arthur C Clarkes novel came first, and the movie tried to capture it…Unfortunately, I believe Stanley Kubrick was the director, and he didn’t do as well with that one as he did with A Clockwork Orange…

      • To be fair, Murf, if there’s an outpost of civilization here in East TN, it’s Knoxville and Johnson City. So it makes sense that the study would come out of there.

        • I’ll take your word for it…As far as I can recall, I’ve been in TN once in my entire 62 years, and that was a drive through, I didn’t even have to stop to get gas…lol

          • But I DID have to stop in Kansas for gas one time on another trip, and I guarantee you that was even worse…lol I kid you not, I stopped at a gas oasis with literally nothing but corn as far as the eye could see…A little old lady asked me if I could tell her where she was, and I said, “Literally, the middle of Nowhere.”

          • My mother and I went on a short visit to relatives in southeast Kansas. That part has actual hills and not many wheatfields. Pretty country, nice people (if you’re white, anyway), but they’ve been voting R since 1870 and haven’t noticed that they’re now voting against everything their ancestors fought for.

          • Wow!!! Actual hills?!? lol S giant could have played pocket billiards on the part of KS that I drove through…

  3. This is the most obnoxious article I’ve ever read. Even if it is true, what are you saying? Trump should be impeached because some people on the Internet posted stuff? That’s protected under the first amendment and secondly has nothing to do with Trump. So what if there is correlation? Trump can’t control what Internet trolls do.

    • Here…Here’s a cool, damp cloth…Who ever said a word about impeachment??? Trump has been braying at the moon about “No COLLUSION!!!” ever since the day that the investigation started, and now we’re getting empirical evidence that outside Russian interference directly benefited his poll numbers…Don’t help your case any that I specifically stated in the article that there was no way to gauge how long any bouncer lasted, or if it actually affected any votes…The article was put up simply to inform of the new information…

    • Oh, and by the way, you might want to rethink your last sentence…Trump sure as SHIT can control what the Russian trolls do when his campaign manager provides them with specific information, and specific targets and criteria to weaponize their tweets…And that’s where the collusion comes in, which directly affects Trump…

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here