Ho hum, you may say, Donald is off raving again on social media, this time about “Phony” Maggie Hagerman and the Failing New York Times. There’s nothing new here except a current glimpse of Trump’s mental landscape, which is becoming progressively more paranoid and agitated as time goes on. Take a look.
Trump: Maggot Hagerman, the Fake Reporter from The Failing New York Times, an unattractive person both inside and out, and who knows less about me than most reporters on the beat…
She’s a stalker, and should be forced to turn over any and all money that she’s made through her… pic.twitter.com/mbGc8dEcUo
— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) August 28, 2026
Reading between the lines, I would make the assumption that Trump did want to speak on 9/11 and when he was refused, decided to go down to the Pentagon because his buddy Pete will let him do anything there. That’s my best guess from this tweet.
The outrage and the paranoia are increasing. This is a minor news story and it doesn’t warrant Trump (or anybody) going off the deep end about it. But off he is nonetheless. And nobody cares about something this minor. Trump is so far gone these days that he’s expending a dollar’s worth of outrage on a penny’s worth of imagined insult.
You can begin to understand why Melania is incognito all the time. Who would want to be around a psyche like that?
So he doesn’t want to speak in New York because he ‘speaks all the time’? Then why is he going to the Pentagon where you know damn well he’ll speak. No way will he let Hegseth be the one to get all the attention!
Well, dear Donald, if you’re so concerned about the NYC 9/11 ceremony being such a “solemn affair” (where–in your own words–“no one ever speaks”), then why are you NOT going to the NYC 9/11 ceremony? Were you simply not invited? Or DID you get an “invitation” to visit the Pentagon and you chose to attend that one? And ARE you speaking at that event or aren’t you?
Your rant seems to indicate that Hagerman’s story “accused” you of TWO separate points (the first being your not attending NYC because you’re not allowed to give a speech and the second being your attendance and speech at the Pentagon) and you only kind of definitively argue against the validity of ONE of those points (the NYC event is too “solemn” and no one ever gives speeches).
As far as the accusation about Hagerman’s being a “scammer,” well I suppose YOU would know a “scammer,” wouldn’t you? How many billions have you made off your “fans” while failing to really deliver almost nothing (whether footwear or phones or digital coinage or education or steaks)?