Exposure Of Tom Cotton Isn’t The First Time Arkansas’ Media Failed The Nation

12
457

Late Saturday night, Salon’s Roger Sollenberger dropped a devastating report that revealed Senator Tom Cotton had built his entire career on an outrageous lie. The junior Senator from Arkansas has frequently billed himself as a former Army Ranger in Iraq and Afghanistan, but it turns out that he never served in the elite 75th Ranger Regiment. The fact that Cotton already had a distinguished career in the Army–including two commendations and a Bronze Star–makes his exposure even more outrageous.

Cotton attended Ranger School, a two-month tactical course open to any Army member in good standing. By completing the course, he earned the right to wear the “Ranger tab” on his uniform. While “Ranger tab” and “Army Ranger” are often confused outside military circles, military protocol is clear–unless you served in the 75th, you cannot call yourself a Ranger.

Congressman Jason Crow of Colorado, himself a Ranger, reminded Cotton of this on Saturday.

Even more staggering is that, in the absence of something we haven’t heard or seen, no one in the Arkansas local media corps saw fit to vet Cotton’s claims to be a Ranger. It’s not that they didn’t have the opportunity to do so before Salon’s exposure. In 2012, when he mounted what would be a successful bid for Congress representing much of southwestern Arkansas, Cotton frequently touted his experience as a “U. S. Army Ranger.”

Let it be said clear, straight, and at once–the exposure of Cotton as a liar should also be reckoned as a searing indictment of Arkansas’ local press. The consequences of this dereliction are staggering. Had Cotton’s lies about his military record been caught in 2012, it’s a safe bet that he would have never made it to Congress for a single term. And had this exposure happened when he was running for Senate in 2014, that bid would have likely been dead in the water. Indeed, if I were Mark Pryor, the man Cotton upended in that race, I would have every right to raise hell.

Had these lies been exposed sooner, we would have never seen Cotton’s now-infamous letter to the Iranian mullahs questioning the Obama administration’s ability to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran–an episode that won Cotton the nickname “Tehran Tom.” We would have likely never seen an equally infamous op-ed in which Cotton called for military force to quell protests against racial injustice.

But believe it or not, that’s not the most egregious case in recent memory where the nation ended up getting the bill after the Natural State’s fifth estate fell asleep at the wheel. How do you get worse than failing to expose a politician’s lies? Quite easily, as it turns out. Arkansas’ local media missed an opportunity to unmask America’s most infamous babymakers, Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar, at least a year before the nation was introduced to them.

You may recall that in 2015, we learned that the Duggars’ oldest son, Josh, had molested several girls in 2002 and 2003–including his own sisters. Soon after that scandal broke, the Inquisitr revealed that the Duggars’ living situation at the time almost certainly created the environment that led to that abuse. When Discovery Communications first introduced the nation to the Duggars in 2003, they were living in a three-bedroom, two-bath house in Springdale–the sister city of Fayetteville, home of the University of Arkansas.

At the time, the Duggar clan comprised Jim Bob, Michelle, and 14 children, nine of whom had been born in the time that the Duggars moved there in 1993. In the time Discovery Health and TLC filmed three one-hour specials about the Duggars, Michelle gave birth to two more. Do the math–18 people were jammed into a house designed for, at most, six people.

This situation created a smorgasbord of logistical nightmares. The kids had to take showers in shifts; some went on Monday, others on Tuesday. But most seriously, since there wasn’t nearly enough room for room for each kid to have his or her own bed, boys and girls had to share the same room, and even shared the same beds. In other words, this created a situation where inappropriate touching and fondling could easily occur.

The Duggars were not only flouting basic standards of safety and sanitation, but were also flouting the law. Like nearly all decent-sized cities, Springdale requires safe occupancy limits to be written into all residential building permits. They not only spell out the maximum number of people who can live in a house, but also set minimum square footage for bedrooms. As real estate agents, Jim Bob and Michelle were required by state law to know about these requirements. And yet, they simply ignored them.

Additionally, the Duggars’ real estate investments almost certainly gave them the financial means to get a better living situation for their growing clan. Their failure to do so appeared to meet the legal definition of child neglect in Arkansas. Indeed, Jim Bob openly boasted about how he forced his kids to wear second-hand shoes.

Jim Bob, as we all know, served a single term in the state house as a Republican from 2001 to 2003. It simply defies belief that Jim Bob would have made it out of the Republican primary–then as now, the real contest in congested-red northwest Arkansas–had the truth about his family’s living situation been known. The exposure of a man who could find the time to serve in Little Rock, but not find the time to get a better living situation for his family, would have all but ended Jim Bob’s political career before it started.

Now here’s where this situation gets hideous. In 2002, Jim Bob gave up his state house seat to challenge then-Senator Tim Hutchinson, brother of now-governor Asa Hutchinson, in the Republican primary. He financed his bid with $250,000 of his own money. So he could spend $250,000 to run for Senate, but not get a bigger house for his family? Indeed, $250,000 would have been more than enough at the time to get a decent-sized single-family house in that part of Arkansas.

Ultimately, Jim Bob finished a distant second behind Hutchinson, garnering only 22 percent of the vote. But had the media delved more into Jim Bob’s background, they would have seen a man who could plunk down $250,000 to run for Senate while forcing his family to live in an unsafe, unsanitary and unlawful situation.

It’s a near-certainty that after the exposure of the Duggars’ living situation, Josh’s molestation of his sisters and other girls in the neighborhood would have come to light as well. Additionally, we would have learned about how Jim Bob and Michelle deliberately slow-walked reporting it, even though there was no morally or legally defensible reason to do so. There’s no question about it–had the media vetted the Duggars sooner, Josh’s abuse, as well as the Duggars’ decision to cover it up, would have come to light well before Discovery even heard of them. Indeed, the argument can be made that had the media delved into the Duggars in 2000, the abuse would have never happened.

Cotton’s deceit and the Duggars’ disregard for their kids’ safety ought to be reckoned as black eyes for the local media in Arkansas. In both cases, the exposure of both these outrages could have easily been done with some old-fashioned legwork by people right at home. The fact it took the national media to do what the local media should have done says a lot about the state of the local press–and it isn’t good.

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.

12 COMMENTS

  1. Excellent piece, Darrell, about a horrific situation. Unfortunately all the lies and covering-up are unsurprising, both from the principals involved and the local media. This should have all been exposed long ago, and some of the girls involved might have been spared. Well written; I look forward to more from you.

  2. I’ve got a small quibble regarding Ranger School, the 8 week leadership course that once completed allows someone to wear that tab. It’s actually open to members of all branches of the military. My big quibble of course is with Cotton himself. As you say he had plenty of military experience including combat to burnish his credentials as a political candidate. He could certainly avoided service altogether yet volunteered and did two combat tours. That’s quite commendable. At the same time, he was in long enough and having completed that Ranger school knew damn well the distinction between THAT and completing the actual Ranger qualification course and serving in the 75th Regiment as an actual Ranger. And the right to wear that distinctive tan beret. However, MOST people don’t know the difference.

    Cotton had no need to do the whole Stolen Valor routine, yet did so anyway assuming he’d get away with it. After all, it was well known he’d served in combat and won medals which makes questioning one’s service a rather dicey proposition. That’s especially true of an opponent whether in a primary or general election who didn’t serve at all. What I’m driving at is that political candidates, especially when you get to the statewide and federal level (and especially for Senator) do opposition research on those even in their own Party. Cotton’s opponents including in GOP primaries knew he was fudging his military record. Yes, they could have (and should have) ruined his political career right then and there but they would have ruined their own as well so they kept their mouths shut. The media/reporters? Same thing. Unless someone who was an ACTUAL Ranger, someone who’d served in the 75th and in combat like Representative Crow was covering him or running against him Cotton correctly calculated no one would call him out. And of course that most of the public wouldn’t know he was lying about being part of what has rightly (and I say that as someone who was a Marine grunt a lifetime ago) considered an elite unit.

    It was a nifty piece of political PR slight of hand. Even fellow Republicans who knew the truth wouldn’t call him out on it and I’m glad you focused on the media because decades of pounding from conservatives would have created howls of protest. GOP voters don’t have any use for subtle distinctions that take reading an entire paragraph to explain. Even when the subtle distinction is about an enormous LIE. Cotton could be reasonably sure even national media would be hesitant to call him out.

    I think that like so many (especially those under 50 or so) conservatives Cotton simply couldn’t fathom the concept that DEMOCRATS, even liberal ones (like me) would sign up and serve in the Armed Forces including in combat arms. That someday on the other side of the aisle there would be someone who actually WAS what Cotton only led the public to believe he’d been that would so bluntly call him the LIAR, the STOLEN VALOR asshole that he is. Sadly, Cotton’s political career will likely survive this. He did after all serve two combat tours and is from a ruby red state. However I think, or at least hope that this drives a stake through the heart of his Presidential ambitions. It will be an issue if he goes ahead and makes a 2024 run. It will be interesting to see if he does run whether he goes “all in” and resigns his seat to campaign full time or tries to hedge his bet by keeping his seat. If we are lucky, very very lucky he either won’t run for President or flames out in the primary. And, if he stays in the Senate during his attempt when he comes up for re-election someone with their own combat experience (preferably of course a Democrat) takes Cotton out

    • I did note in the article that there’s a difference between “Ranger tab” and an actual Ranger.
      But wow, you think Cotton’s primary opponents for House in 2012 and Senate in 2014 knew he was embellishing his record and kept their mouths shut lest it sink their own careers? I would think that in a veteran-heavy state like Arkansas, being called out for fudging your record would be lethal. Especially in a Republican primary.

      • That’s the (possible – assuming I’m correct) brilliance of the sleaze on Cotton’s part. He did after all leave behind a promising and on the rise career to serve in the Army and did two combat tours and with a measure of distinction. Alas, like baseball idiots like Roger Clemmens and Barry Bonds who were destined already to be first ballot Hall of Famers and couldn’t leave it at that and went on the juice, Cotton chose to embellish his own credentials. As you note his state is quite conservative and has plenty of veterans. Unless he ran up against a primary or general election opponent that was a bona fide Ranger or another Veteran with a batch of higher awards than Cotton received those conservative voters would have rationalized his embellishment – the old IOKIYAR thing. Even now I’m sure some of them are trying to find ways to rationalize Cotton’s doing what he did, and outside the Rangers and full-on spec ops people or those who went through the same leadership course Cotton did the distinction isn’t readily apparent unless you did into things a bit. And conservative voters will go for the easy, bumper sticker length marketing every time. They don’t do nuance very well, and more often than not don’t even try. Hopefully, the glare of the spotlight of Presidential politics will force them to realize how sleazy Cotton has been about this. Then, and only then will they have to take a hard look, and at that point he might be in real political trouble against a capable opponent with their own military pedigree. We can hope.

  3. Senator Cotton is very dangerous regarding China Policy! I literally watched him on a news discussion outside of American media giving extreme views as well as ultimatums and it was made to appear as if he was in charge as if he were Secretary of State! A list is a liar no matter what and a deep dive into Cotton is a must! It’s very troubling that he was totally telling a lie regarding serving as an Army Ranger and I feel there is certainly more that would be disqualifying if investigated!!

  4. I don’t know the specific situation in Arkansas but since about 2000 newspapers have been gutting their reporting staffs and demanding more and more of them, so they might have en leery of running any stories about the Duggars which could have ended in lawsuits. They also probably didn’t think at the time that such a minor political figure was worth the risk.

    As far as Tom Cotton goes, I think the fact that he did serve, and apparently served honorably, made them complacent and took their eye off the ball.

  5. He may have passed the exam in the ‘training school’ but that doesn’t mean he actually served AS a Ranger so he couldn’t possible have had “experience as an Army Ranger”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here