It is a sober day when you wake up to read Politico and discover that an expert on Russia of the caliber of Fiona Hill has gone on record making two statements of devastating significance, one, Putin put nuclear weapons on the table as an option long ago and will use them and two, when asked about the possibility of WWIII said, “We’re already in it.” Politico did a lengthy interview with Hill and it’s one of those must-read articles if you want to understand where we are today with Ukraine and how we got there. Hill says, “Putin’s opened up a door in Europe that we thought we’d closed after World War II.” We were wrong. Politico:

Reynolds: The more we talk, the more we’re using World War II analogies. There are people who are saying we’re on the brink of a World War III.

Hill: We’re already in it. We have been for some time. We keep thinking of World War I, World War II as these huge great big set pieces, but World War II was a consequence of World War I. And we had an interwar period between them. And in a way, we had that again after the Cold War. Many of the things that we’re talking about here have their roots in the carving up of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Russian Empire at the end of World War I. At the end of World War II, we had another reconfiguration and some of the issues that we have been dealing with recently go back to that immediate post-war period. We’ve had war in Syria, which is in part the consequence of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, same with Iraq and Kuwait.

All of the conflicts that we’re seeing have roots in those earlier conflicts. We are already in a hot war over Ukraine, which started in 2014. People shouldn’t delude themselves into thinking that we’re just on the brink of something. We’ve been well and truly in it for quite a long period of time.

But this is also a full-spectrum information war, and what happens in a Russian “all-of-society” war, you soften up the enemy. You get the Tucker Carlsons and Donald Trumps doing your job for you. The fact that Putin managed to persuade Trump that Ukraine belongs to Russia, and that Trump would be willing to give up Ukraine without any kind of fight, that’s a major success for Putin’s information war. I mean he has got swathes of the Republican Party — and not just them, some on the left, as well as on the right — masses of the U.S. public saying, “Good on you, Vladimir Putin,” or blaming NATO, or blaming the U.S. for this outcome. This is exactly what a Russian information war and psychological operation is geared towards. He’s been carefully seeding this terrain as well. We’ve been at war, for a very long time. I’ve been saying this for years.

And Putin will not stop at Ukraine, either. If Ukraine falls, as the Ukrainian ambassador has put it, “Democracy might just fail as well.” That’s just fine with Putin, because he wants to rebuild the old Russian empire.

Reynolds: And you do not think he will necessarily stop at Ukraine?

Hill: Of course he won’t. Ukraine has become the front line in a struggle, not just for which countries can or cannot be in NATO, or between democracies and autocracies, but in a struggle for maintaining a rules-based system in which the things that countries want are not taken by force. Every country in the world should be paying close attention to this. Yes, there may be countries like China and others who might think that this is permissible, but overall, most countries have benefited from the current international system in terms of trade and economic growth, from investment and an interdependent globalized world. This is pretty much the end of this. That’s what Russia has done.

Reynolds: He’s blown up the rules-based international order.

Hill: Exactly. What stops a lot of people from pulling out of Russia even temporarily is, they will say, “Well, the Chinese will just step in.” This is what every investor always tells me. “If I get out, someone else will move in.” I’m not sure that Russian businesspeople want to wake up one morning and find out the only investors in the Russian economy are Chinese, because then Russia becomes the periphery of China, the Chinese hinterlands, and not another great power that’s operating in tandem with China. […]

We first have to think about what Vladimir Putin has done and the nature of what we’re facing. People don’t want to talk about Adolf Hitler and World War II, but I’m going to talk about it. Obviously the major element when you talk about World War II, which is overwhelming, is the Holocaust and the absolute decimation of the Jewish population of Europe, as well as the Roma-Sinti people.

But let’s focus here on the territorial expansionism of Germany, what Germany did under Hitler in that period: seizure of the Sudetenland and the Anschluss or annexation of Austria, all on the basis that they were German speakers. The invasion of Poland. The treaty with the Soviet Union, the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, that also enabled the Soviet Union to take portions of Poland but then became a prelude to Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union. Invasions of France and all of the countries surrounding Germany, including Denmark and further afield to Norway. Germany eventually engaged in a burst of massive territorial expansion and occupation. Eventually the Soviet Union fought back. Vladimir Putin’s own family suffered during the siege of Leningrad, and yet here is Vladimir Putin doing exactly the same thing.

And as to the nukes, Putin told Trump that he had them and would use them but Trump was too stupid to understand, which makes complete sense. The shocker would be if Trump actually had a clue about something of massive import.

Reynolds: And then there’s the nuclear element. Many people have thought that we’d never see a large ground war in Europe or a direct confrontation between NATO and Russia, because it could quickly escalate into a nuclear conflict. How close are we getting to that?

Hill: Well, we’re right there. Basically, what President Putin has said quite explicitly in recent days is that if anybody interferes in Ukraine, they will be met with a response that they’ve “never had in [their] history.” And he has put Russia’s nuclear forces on high alert. So he’s making it very clear that nuclear is on the table.

Putin tried to warn Trump about this, but I don’t think Trump figured out what he was saying. In one of the last meetings between Putin and Trump when I was there, Putin was making the point that: “Well you know, Donald, we have these hypersonic missiles.” And Trump was saying, “Well, we will get them too.” Putin was saying, “Well, yes, you will get them eventually, but we’ve got them first.” There was a menace in this exchange. Putin was putting us on notice that if push came to shove in some confrontational environment that the nuclear option would be on the table.

Reynolds: Do you really think he’ll use a nuclear weapon?

Hill: The thing about Putin is, if he has an instrument, he wants to use it. Why have it if you can’t? He’s already used a nuclear weapon in some respects. Russian operatives poisoned Alexander Litvinenko with radioactive polonium and turned him into a human dirty bomb and polonium was spread all around London at every spot that poor man visited. He died a horrible death as a result.

The Russians have already used a weapons-grade nerve agent, Novichok. They’ve used it possibly several times, but for certain twice. Once in Salisbury, England, where it was rubbed all over the doorknob of Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, who actually didn’t die; but the nerve agent contaminated the city of Salisbury, and anybody else who came into contact with it got sickened. Novichok killed a British citizen, Dawn Sturgess, because the assassins stored it in a perfume bottle which was discarded into a charity donation box where it was found by Sturgess and her partner. There was enough nerve agent in that bottle to kill several thousand people. The second time was in Alexander Navalny’s underpants.

So if anybody thinks that Putin wouldn’t use something that he’s got that is unusual and cruel, think again. Every time you think, “No, he wouldn’t, would he?” Well, yes, he would. And he wants us to know that, of course.

It’s not that we should be intimidated and scared. That’s exactly what he wants us to be. We have to prepare for those contingencies and figure out what is it that we’re going to do to head them off.

It’s interesting how Putin’s personality was formed. Many people who have lived through something hellacious in their lives — and I had one friend who was a holocaust survivor imprisoned at Dachau. He was “one of the people on those shelves” as he put it — gain a certain maturity and wisdom from the experience. They become gentle, compassionate souls. They’re happy to be alive and they appreciate all the simple pleasures which were denied them when they were being tormented.

Other people, and Putin is obviously one of them, suffer from a display of brute power and they crave it. They want to be the one kicking in the door and brutalizing others.

I’m no psychologist, but it well could be that Putin became who he is because of the terror he felt as a young person during the siege of Leningrad. He never wanted to be in that position again. And so he turned into the kind of monster that doles out that level of violence, because somehow that makes sense to him, as a way to protect himself from future harm. Very twisted. But if you’ve been reading the papers these days, the man is off kilter. He has lost it and the people around him can’t get him advice anymore.

We will see how this ends. May God help the valiant Ukrainians in their struggle. I respect the hell out of those people and I particularly admire both Volodomyr Zelensky and their no bullshit ambassador to the United Nations, Sergiy Kyslytsya. I love seeing him sock it to the Russian ambassador, who keeps his COVID mask on, not out of discretion, I fear, but to hide his face. And well he should want to hide his face, representing a country which is behaving so disgracefully.

 

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.

Support the site with a subscription today and see no more ads!

Go Ad-free Now!

7 COMMENTS

  1. Putin was born on October 7, 1952. The siege of Leningrad ended in 1944. He had to become the monster he is from some other experience.

    • Malignant narcissists are born, not made in my opinion. Psychiatrists run when a true personality disorder appears like cheeto & his master puty.

  2. putie could have told the shit gibbon that the hand up his ass was just grabbing the gold coins his rectum produces. The shit gibbon would have believed that in a heartbeat and figured that was where his “billions” came from. Smart, the former guy isn’t. Gullible? Oh yeah, gullible as shit.

    When are we going to learn we cannot afford to have stupidity running this country? Haven’t reagan, two bushes, and the shit gibbon proven this?

  3. Putin is suffering from Paranoid Schizophrenia , a picture doesn’t lie. When I saw him sitting at the end of that 30 or 40 foot table and his own Generals sitting at the other end , that was the proof. He doesn’t trust his own Generals ?? This is why he is so dangerous . You wanna bet someone has to taste his food before he eats it ? And when you look at his eyes, there’s nothing there . I feel sorry for those around him .

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here