You have to wonder what makes these people try to redirect with attacks all the time. It makes one wonder what they are hiding because *all* of them are so defensive. We know they have been idiots anyway. It’s already been proven in just a little more than the 8 months that they have been “in office”. They haven’t hidden it very well at all.
Now Pam Blondi is under oath at a Senate hearing. She is trying to dodge answering questions and is going on the offensive to hide it. It’s still not working. She’s not the biggest idiot of the bunch, but she certainly is an idiot. And partisan, very much so. The DoJ is supposed to be apolitical, and it isn’t. That part sucks. Picture and article from Raw Story:
Attorney General Pam Bondi drew reactions from those watching her appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, when, instead of answering specific questions from Democrats, she turned to attack them personally. Bondi attacked Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) over a campaign talking point from more than 15 years ago about his service as a U.S. Marine. She claimed Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) took money from someone who knew sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. When it came to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Reuters photographer Jonathan Ernst noticed that Bondi flipped open a file that provided her with the lines to use in attacking the Senators.
When she is trying to turn back a question from a Democrat. Now, how did she come up with that? I would guess she had someone do the work for her, because there is doubt as to whether or not she’s got enough brains to do it herself. Really, now, attacks? That’s something a 5-year-old might do (and apologies to the real 5-year-olds). She can’t even remember this information for herself? How embarrassing. And funny! Yet … this … this is sad.
At the top of a folder was a tweet from Whitehouse from July in which he called for ethics investigations into members of the U.S. Supreme Court who may have violated rules. The second note reads “Whitehouse” in bold letters, then fed Bondi the line, “You claim to be a social justice warrior, but you’re a member of the Senate,” and then cuts off in the photo. The next line reads, “You rail against dark money but you work with dark money groups.” The third bullet point was underlined in blue pen, reading, “You talk about corruption but you push for legislation that would ….,” and cuts off. The fourth bullet point read simply, “You’re a total hypocrite.” She didn’t appear to use the attacks, however.
It certainly seems she didn’t, which is something strange. She attacked others, but not Senator Whitehouse. One could assume he asked his share of questions, so why not? Why *didn’t* she use them? She even had multiple options for him. What’s up with that? We would like to know.
In a handwritten note below the lines, one talking point that she did attempt to deploy. “If asked admit personnel or firings — I’ll tell you a personnel issue that I’m [missing word] agents are on the streets keeping America [missing words] a paycheck b/c you voted to shut [missing words].” Several times, Bondi ignored questions about personnel matters by saying outright she refused to answer the question or by attacking the Democrat, saying they voted to shut down the government. Finally, a note that she used several times, that was also handwritten, read, “Epstein— Did you take $ from Reid Hoffman???”
Oyyy. She shouldn’t have brought up Epstein because that’s sure to fire up the Democrats even more. They’ve been trying for quite some time to get access to those files. They’re not giving up, either. And now, Republicans are joining them. But she still went on the offensive, or attempted to.
It’s not going to do her any good because it shows exactly what she’s doing. Doesn’t answer? Make a note of that. We should be able to figure out exactly what she *is* doing by not answering. Plus, democratic Senate members are a lot smarter than she is! We’re onto you, Pam. She tried and failed. Let’s see what she’s been up to, shall we? Waiting on you, Senators!
Friends, I know everyone asks you for money. I promise you, of all the outlets asking forit spare change, we are the smallest and the hardest working. We’re a group of old, disabled people, except for one writer in his mid-50s. The rest of us are in our sixties and seventies, and this is a labor of love. All we’re asking for is the chance to keep telling the truth about Trump and help ensure democracy survives. If you can help, please do. Thank you. Ursula
