Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly are two people who would still be working for tens of millions of dollars had they not been busted for tearing up people of color (Kelly) and women (Tucker Carlson). So any time that they are interviewing one or the other they should probably stay away from identity anything.
Today, Kelly had Tucker on her podcast when they began talking about gay rights (Right after a discussion about Lindsey Graham being initially anti-JD Vance.) Somehow the conversation steered toward LGBTQ rights with Tucker getting on a soapbox about hating being “lectured.” This is understandable since he was really lectured when fired by Fox.
As Tucker is quoted:below and then video:
“I don’t want to be mean and also I don’t want to say things I can’t prove, but like, let’s, let’s be real. I’m never going to take another lecture about gay rights from these people, like, ‘Oh, you hate gays and you keep them all in the closet or whatever.’
Why would Tucker have a problem discussing gay rights? And what is he referencing in “things I can’t prove”? There is nothing to really lecture about if he doesn’t care, which he says he doesn’t below:
“Any party — you know, stop with the, with the lectures about that stuff. Do you know what I mean? If you’re so for, in general, if you’re so for gay rights then that would mean that any member of your party who’s gay would feel free to say so in public and would not be pretending not to be gay.
By the way, he’s clearly referencing Tim Walz as “pretending not to be gay” in the quote above because they’d talked JD Vance and then Walz previously. Obviously, if Walz was somewhere on the “spectrum” no one would care, and it’s important to note that he’s married and seemingly as straight as can be. So it’s tough to figure out where Tucker is going with this:
“I’m just saying. You know what I mean? Like, I hate the falseness of it!”
What part is false? He isn’t even referencing a specific Walz quote. This is the guy who got fired by Fox News for misogynistic comments along with election lies, so it’s not like he has any credibility when talking about gender or LGBTQ issues. This is especially true after a conversation that began with a lament about Lindsey Graham and his initial problems with JD Vance – then transitioned into Walz. Video below:
Yeah, so tough to figure out.
If any party has LGBTQ issues it would have to be the Trump-supporters on the Right – and even most of them no longer care. So it is hard to see why Tucker finds this topic worthy of even bringing up, never mind giggling about it like a high school locker room conversation.
Meanwhile, Kelly can’t help giggling herself. It is one of the strangest conversations with Carlson that I’ve seen in a long time. It is a bit interesting because Carlson – if anything – has been more centered on issues and even had some moderates/left on his podcast. So it’s not like he’s really been pandering to anyone nor is he so directly focused on promoting anything on the far Right.
Kind of hard to understand but easily seen as bizarre. These two should be watched but not necessarily for regular comment, more weird stuff like this that might be code for something. Of course, people were offended by their “regular stuff” before. Maybe they don’t do “regular” anymore.
God Bless: I can be reached at [email protected] and @JasonMiciak
Tucker’s says let people’s private lives be private – so what about women’s rights to abortion? Isn’t that private? Just sayin…
My take was they were calling Rim Walz’s enthusiasm “gay”. That’s what they were giggling about. Dumbasses! The entire right are so weird!
Even Fux News banished Tucker to the wilderness. I suggest we just leave him there. He has no place in any of our lives and I for one never want to see, hear or think about him. Happily, I have no idea who Megyn Kelly is and don’t want to find out. Why go in search of shit?
of course, Tim walz and his eyeliner. oh wait, that’s jd isn’t it.
Liar tuck would do better to address his constant facial expression of looking like he just shit himself.
Governor Walz is married with children-that isn’t enough for liar tuck? My, he must be getting truly desperate to be this silly on what one presumes is a nation-wide show (I don’t KNOW if this is covered nation-wide but I thought I’d be generous).
Isn’t it a bit of a truism that the ones who are most ardent to prove they’re straight are the biggest closet cases out there?
If Tuck-Tuck is casting aspersions on Tim Walz, I’m willing to bet that Tuck-Tuck has a couple of skeletons in his own closet. I mean, Tuck-Tuck supposedly has a wife and kids–just like Tim Walz–so why does Tuck-Tuck think his hetero credentials are any stronger?
Who really gives a Flying FK what tucker or skull face kelly think. They are 2 irrelevant Sunset Boulevard has beens and Megyn your bleached blonde fox hottie status is so yesterday sweetie take up sewing.
I usually find that when someone is as adamant about being anti gay as tucker is then hints someone like waltz might be hinding something is usually a clear sign he’s exactly what he’s professing against. Translation i think tucker is as gay as they come and would love to shout it from the rooftops