Trump Mishandling of Intelligence Burned CIA’s Top Kremlin Spy


Warning, set down whatever is in your hand so as not to drop it.

Have no doubt, the United States’ Intelligence community fully appreciates the danger Trump’s behavior represents with respect to Russia. Indeed, the CIA had cause to fear that Trump’s Russian antics might get an asset killed. From an explosive new CNN report:

In a previously undisclosed secret mission in 2017, the United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN….

….The decision to carry out the extraction occurred soon after a May 2017 meeting in the Oval Office in which Trump discussed highly classified intelligence with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and then-Russian Ambassador to the US Sergey Kislyak. The intelligence, concerning ISIS in Syria, had been provided by Israel.

We have known for some time that Trump handed over sensitive intelligence to Kislyak during the Oval Office meeting. That meeting has long been the subject of serious questions. American presidents generally do not invite top Russian “diplomats” (spies) INSIIDE the Oval Office. Moreover, Trump summoned the Russians to the White House just a day after firing James Comey, telling staff and the Russians that the investigation was “over.” Last, we Americans might not have even known about the meeting had a photograph of the men not been issued by a Russian news agency and photographer.

Evidently, the meeting’s extraordinary circumstances and the mishandling of intelligence sent fear coursing through the intelligence community.

Of course, the CIA denies the CNN story:

“CNN’s narrative that the Central Intelligence Agency makes life-or-death decisions based on anything other than objective analysis and sound collection is simply false. Misguided speculation that the President’s handling of our nation’s most sensitive intelligence—which he has access to each and every day—drove an alleged exfiltration operation is inaccurate.”

Note that the spokesperson did not say that the extraction never took place, only that Trump’s mishandling of “our nation’s most sensitive intelligence” did not “drive” the decision. And, of course, this denial comes from the same executive branch that slapped the Birmingham NWS, while ordering NOAA silenced. That order involved a fcking weather forecast, not treason with classified intelligence. Under no circumstances would we expect the CIA to officially confirm the story.

Mike Pompeo’s office  – the man who was CIA director at the time – had no comment on the story, which is not a denial.

Of course, Trump’s ongoing bizarre behavior toward Russia would only validate the CIA’s fears:

Those concerns continued to grow in the period after Trump’s Oval Office meeting with Kislyak and Lavrov. Weeks after the decision to extract the spy, in July 2017, Trump met privately with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the G20 summit in Hamburg and took the unusual step of confiscating the interpreter’s notes. Afterward, intelligence officials again expressed concern that the President may have improperly discussed classified intelligence with Russia, according to an intelligence source with knowledge of the intelligence community’s response to the Trump-Putin meeting.

Recall it was Trump who insisted upon meeting with Putin privately, without a single American diplomat present. Trump could have given Putin the nuclear codes and we would not know. After all, Trump himself confiscated the translator’s notes.

Trump’s confiscation of the notes ought to cause every elected Republican to demand a full investigation into the meeting, including a demand that the translator testify before the House and Senate. Of course, such an action would require loyalty to one’s nation over loyalty to party and leader.

We know that Russian investigations upset Trump. And today’s elected Republicans are more willing to risk U.S. security than risk upsetting Trump.

Given everything else we know, why is this so important? Because we lost a person whose value might well have been incalculable:

Knowledge of the Russian covert source’s existence was highly restricted within the US government and intelligence agencies. According to one source, there was “no equal alternative” inside the Russian government, providing both insight and information on Putin … “The impact would be huge because it is so hard to develop sources like that in any denied area, particularly Russia, because the surveillance and security there is so stringent,” a former senior intelligence official told CNN. “You can’t reacquire a capability like that overnight.

Given that there appeared to be no reason at all to share the intelligence at the brief gathering in the Oval Office, a person is near forced to wonder if Trump passed the intelligence precisely because it would burn the top American “asset” in the Russian government.

The counter-argument is no more comforting, that Trump is incapable of thinking so strategically regarding international espionage. That doesn’t preclude the possibility that Kislyak didn’t “ask” certain questions, guaranteed to reveal the source of the intelligence.

We cannot know. Yet. We only know that we lost our most valuable “eyes and ears” in the Kremlin, because our president cannot be trusted with our most sensitive intelligence. He will hand it to Russians, or Tweet it to the world.

Tell me again that the United States intelligence community doesn’t know damn well that Trump will do anything to pleas Putin and Russia, including risking lives.

We end by recognizing the white-hot irony to all this. Trump supporters – to this day – want Hillary Clinton jailed because she might have left sensitive information on her server.

“But her emailzzz.”

Back then, Republicans pretended to care about national security, and the nation as a whole. Now we know better.


Peace, y’all


[email protected], Twitter, @MIciakZoom



Help keep the site running, consider supporting.


  1. I am convinced that CIA involvement is a major reason why we know so little at the present time on what’s actually going on with Trump. Hell, apply that to ANY of the Alphabet Soup agencies…it’s probably a constant tug of war keeping certain secrets safe from this maladministration.

    • That first sentence makes no sense. The IC has nothing to do with not knowing what’s going on with Himself. That’s on his staff, the media, and the enablers in Congress.

      • I would argue that it has EVERYTHING to do with it, P J. I recall reports of Trumpista “commissars” going into various federal agencies for signs of disloyalty. No reason to assume the Alphabet Soup agencies would be any different. They are therefore stuck between keeping our country safe and the equally important duty of staying employed so as to block off folks who will botch their job or leave it unattended.

    • All US intelligence agencies including CIA are divided and weakened into 2 separate factions. Those loyal to Trump and his GOP-Nazis (and Putin’s Russia) and those not. Many employees within do not even know who is working with which faction and of course there are double agents everywhere. Also, most US Generals hate Trump personally for his personal attacks on the military and vets and for being a draft dodging coward. Would not be surprised (and really hoping) most Generals go rouge & disobey orders to launch a false flag attack attack on Iran (a la LBJ Gulf of Tonkin and Bush WMD) or other nations which could end up starting WWIII. That is what Pompeo, Bolton and Trump are itching to do to test out their new thousands of “low-yield” nuclear warheads are now being deployed on US jets, in bombs, in cruise missles and on US subs. The “low-yield” label is being touted as “usable nukes”, but in reality each is almost as strong as the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nukes. Doing so would plunge the world into a nuclear winter, irreparably damage our only home: earth, and plunge human civilization into a dark ages. This is the greatest threat that the Trump Administration poses and almost no one seems to be talking about it.

      • Not to be TOO critical, Steve, but is that personal experience, well-sourced secondhand info or pet prejudices informing the above? I have no use for the last, just so you know.

        That out of the way, the amount of bridge-burning Trump has engaged, combined with his inability to understand the concept of prep time, makes any military venture he wants doomed from the start. I also am certain that are FAR more than two factions in the IC. It’s just most have put aside their differences to deal with the current situation.

      • Using such weapons would irreparably damage human civilization from a philosophical point alone. I would note one thing, though, The “nuclear winter” fear stems from a study (I researched this a bit ago) that looked at what might result from full scale global nuclear war, meaning both super powers unleashing their salvos at each other. Isolated uses of nukes – which is NOT forgivable under any circumstances, don’t misread me – isolated use of nukes would not lead to a nuclear winter. It would, however, change humanity forever, as these weapons have been deemed “beyond the use of civilization” up until people like Bolton and/or Trump or whomever might want to use them. We need fear nuclear winter if hundreds of missiles start flying, we need fear for humanity of one is dropped.

  2. Now we know better? NOW? Some of us knew way back then. I fear for the safety of our intelligence people with that ginormous mouth squatting in the WH.

  3. How about we follow the origins of this story and see when and who actually leaked (or made up) the story that “allegedly” led to an intelligence breach.

    John Brennan used to be the head of the CIA. He is now a leader of the “Trump’s gotta go” gang on CNN. He was in charge when the first mention of this “alleged” Russian asset was blasted all over the public airwaves. CNN’s report that you quote indeed says, this asset was considered at risk before Trump took office during the Obama administration. That is because the Washington Post and The New York Times both reported on a deep Russian asset that was so close to Putin that he could read reports on his desk.

    WP reported in June 2017 of “sourcing deep inside the Russian government” — so deep that it purportedly “captured Putin’s specific instructions” to launch a pro-Trump influence campaign. (NSA & other intel officials later questioned this claim).

    NY TIMES WASHINGTON — In 2016, American intelligence agencies delivered urgent and explicit warnings about Russia’s intentions to try to tip the American presidential election — and a detailed assessment of the operation afterward — thanks in large part to informants close to President Vladimir V. Putin and in the Kremlin who provided crucial details.

    In fact, this purported asset had been scheduled to be exfiltrated at that time but is said to have refused to do so.

    You have to ask yourself who in the intelligence community was leaking this stuff to the press and for what reason. Obviously they were trying to make a connection to collusion with Russia by the Trump campaign for present and future use. It worked (regardless of the truth of the story) and was actually covered in the questioning of Lisa Page where she stated that they were considering burning Russian sources to get more information concerning Russian interference in the election. They were hoping to find collusion between Putin and the Trump campaign and were willing to go the route of a political broadside at the expense of a deep cover agent.

    Saint Mueller spent the better part of three years looking for this collusion and couldn’t find it. Assuming this asset was as close to Putin as they want us to believe, don’t you think it would have been worth it to extract him or in some way to debrief him to provide definitive evidence of collusion? Putin’s circle is extremely tight. If this asset was so close to him don’t you think he is wondering where he went?

    Jim Sciutto is being fed a story to keep the “Orange Man Bad” story percolating and he swallowed it whole. There’s a whole lot more to the story than Trump can’t keep a secret.

    By the way, what did Obama mean when he whispered in Medvedev’s (Putin’s puppet) ear that he would have “more flexibility” once he was reelected?
    I’m not buying it.

    • You completely mischaracterized “Saint Mueller” (Who is a saint, so what’s the deal? Why the need to rip him? You’re giving yourself away). Mueller could not find enough admissible evidence to prosecute a crime, that is entirely different than “not finding collusion” and you know that. Additionally, the commission itself – that you evidently believe since you referenced it – specifically said that part of the problem was that too many witnesses were lying and obstructing.
      It always amazes me the gymnastics that Trump supporters will go through in an effort to defend him and pretend any of this is normal.
      You scrutinize this story looking for possible cracks while avoiding looking at the giant neon flashing light – Trump and his behavior toward Russia – is telling.
      Last, I have considered the intel agencies and their possible motivation for leaking the story. The motivation is more than likely that we’re led by an insane and disloyal person who needs to be gone ASAP, and slipping some truth out is their patriotic duty.
      We’re talking about a man who tweeted to the world a classified picture, bragging coyly about “not” having anything to do with the rocket clollapse, when we HAVE a program in place with the Israelis to do just that. I would fear for my life were I an American asset in Russia bc I do NOT believe he is trustworthy at all.
      You ask about Obama? He meant he’d have more political flexibility after the election, what is weird about that? Obama didn’t have 3 decades of shady business deals with Russian mob figures, hadn’t licked Putin’s …
      Never mind. It is simply hopeless.

      • And that’s my point Jason. You are amazed at the machinations of pro Trump folks and on the other side folks are wondering at the insane leaps taken to throw Trump under the bus for anything and everything.

        For me, it’s not so much defending Trump, it’s the craziness trying to bring him down.

        Anyway, I’ll leave you guys alone. But, you must admit the participation rate took a jump here. Haha.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here