Dr. Jack Brown, Body Language & Emotional Intelligence Expert, did a quick reading of Michelle Bach… er…Amy Coney Barrett and the replies are LIT.
2/ Does this image of Amy Coney Barrett set off your internal alarm bells? — Regardless of your political ideology, it should.
— Dr. Jack Brown (@DrGJackBrown) July 6, 2022
4/ Moreover this is in no way, not even remotely, a true (Duchenne) 'smile'. It's also NOT even a marginally well-feigned smile (i.e., 'social smile').
— Dr. Jack Brown (@DrGJackBrown) July 6, 2022
6/ Along with the partially closed eyelids — the lower eyelids *must* have concave-up furrows (not wrinkles, but furrows arising from a specific eyelid muscular contraction). pic.twitter.com/JTbSDMfP4V
— Dr. Jack Brown (@DrGJackBrown) July 6, 2022
8/ So not only are her eyelids not partially closed (or even mostly closed or all the way closed as they would be for deep smiles of joy-happiness), Coney Barrett's eyelids are opened wider.
— Dr. Jack Brown (@DrGJackBrown) July 6, 2022
10/ While not all mouth asymmetry is indicative of insincerity, it should, most of the time, cause you to pause — and evaluate deeper.
— Dr. Jack Brown (@DrGJackBrown) July 6, 2022
12/ The mouth configuration of Coney Barrett in this image is indicative of Contempt. Note the is a tightness in the area above her left upper lip and a flaring of her left nostril (although mostly shaded) along with lateral tension of the medial aspect of her cheek.
— Dr. Jack Brown (@DrGJackBrown) July 6, 2022
14/ SUMMARY: In the above image, the combination Amy Coney Barrett's:
• Upper eyelids opened wider than baseline
• Lower eyelids tensed
• Contempt mouthMakes this facial expression/thought-emotion indicative of:
• Predation (Predatory)
plus
• Contempt*Alarm Bells*
— Dr. Jack Brown (@DrGJackBrown) July 6, 2022
15/ Addendum: All professionals/individuals/corporate audiences who want to/need to learn #BodyLanguage nuance, please DM or email me ([email protected]).
Ω
— Dr. Jack Brown (@DrGJackBrown) July 6, 2022
Great insights, but on to the good stuff…
I notice a trend. pic.twitter.com/efejJZzjUE
— BeaglesResist ☮🇺🇦🌻 (@BeaglesResist) July 6, 2022
(Pretty bad when Crazy Ted is the most normal looking of the four)
— Linda (@Lindademocat) July 6, 2022
👇👇👇
— Kane Lawless (@kanelawless420) July 6, 2022
🫣🫣😲😲😯
This smile is the last thing you see before you wake up in a tub full of ice with your baby and kidney missing.
— Erica French Csapo (@EricaCsapo) July 6, 2022
😬😬😬😬😬😬
I had the exact same feeling 👇 pic.twitter.com/ImCsP7MNvl
— ᴘʀᴏᴊᴇᴄᴛ ᴍᴀʟᴀʀᴋᴇʏ (@Proj_Malarkey) July 6, 2022
The studious analysis of this may appeal to some, and I'm not calling it into question, but when I have a visceral reaction to a face, that's all I need to know what I'm dealing with. This photo has always done that for me. Human instinct, when still intact, is highly reliable.
— Check It Out (@CheckItOutDR) July 6, 2022
Ouch👇👇👇
That ACB look always reminds of this one. The Beast of Belsen a female guard from a concentration camp tried for war crimes. pic.twitter.com/rjXBAw2tsk
— 🌻Maria Lacombe🌻 (@MariaLacombe) July 7, 2022
Crap! Don't put that Barrett's face on Twitty, I just sprayed my laptop with coffee!
— Ed Hirschler (@HirschlerEd) July 7, 2022
— Michael Vario (@mvario1) July 6, 2022
You should see the look onon her face during the state of the union address when Biden talked about roe vs wade. That look she gave him I'll never forget
— toes in sand. Proud Ex-GOP. Voting for a better f (@KathyL04062299) July 7, 2022
👏👏👏👏
— cmad (@cmadmax) July 7, 2022
Here’s hoping Amy sees Dr. Jack’s thread. She’s earned every bit of it…
She has a deeply unsettling demeanor. Her livid, seething expression during the SOTU when @potus celebrated Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's nomination was pure jealousy and anger. pic.twitter.com/Lio4NpQCz8
— Susan Kay Kenney (@KenneyKay) July 6, 2022
It’s that “it’s going to be rough on *you*” look.
Yes, we know the vagina that replaced Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg is a soulless P.O.S. We hardly need some half-baked facial expression “science” (and it isn’t reputable science BTW) to tell us this. We can, and have, looked into her past and it tells us just how ignorant and evil (those ARE two different things) she truly is.
So, what do we do when evil and ignorance is now the majority on the s.c.? What do we do when the majority on the highest court in our country is comprised of political hacks? We certainly cannot leave things as is–these people will destroy our nation. They are salivating over the chance to do this.
Church is first above EVERYTHING.
Which is a frightening belief for a supreme court justice to espouse before and after attaining that position. As a non-xtian I can tell you the six theocrats on the s.c. are alarming just by being on that bench. Thankfully I have no problem leaving this country should the nation not fix this extremely dangerous problem. Not everyone can do this however and it’s those folks who really need to make sure they get out and vote in the midterms. I wonder how many will?