Sounds like the forewoman of the Fulton county Georgia grand jury that heard Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis’s, Emily Kohrs, has bigger fish to fry. If you’re any member of a grand jury, you are sworn to secrecy about the actual proceedings that take place.

And if you turn around and engage in on record interviews with the news media, including an exclusive interview with MSNBC, That tends to tell me something. And what it tells me is that you’re already busy working on a tell all book, targeting to have it ready to release as soon as the indictments are announced. There’s no other reason to step forward and put your name into the media meat grinder. And God knows it’s been done before. Hell, not one but two members of the Manson jury wrote books once the trial was over.

Kohrs went into this knowing she had to be extremely careful. Grand jury proceedings are secret simply for the reason of protecting the reputations and rights of people who may be under investigation, but have not yet been charged. And in a grand jury, that’s pretty much everybody who appears. After all, the sole purpose of a grand jury is to issue true bills of indictment.

So she had to be careful not to say anything that could infringe on the rights of the witnesses. But she laid a little road map of her own. For instance, forget that shit about perjury indictments. A special grand jury in Georgia can’t issue indictments. What the grand jury here did was to recommend that DA Willis open criminal investigations into one or more people the grand jury felt lied to them. And if warranted, seed their own indictments.

But while she walked between raindrops, Emily laid a trail of breadcrumbs of her own. While refusing to discuss individual testimony, she said that she found former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani as funny, and that after his pitched battle to avoid appearing, she found South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham charming and polite. But let’s be honest, who cares about that shit? We want meat and potatoes.

In talking to the AP, in response to a question about how many people the grand jury recommended indicting, she responded with, It’s not a short list, but when pressed she said that she didn’t think that there would be any Giant plot twist if the judge decided to release the document unredacted. I read that to mean that The people you already think are guilty got recommended for indictment. But when pressed by Blair Alexander of MSNBC, she expanded to say that it was more than a dozen. Quite a field when you consider that more than 75 people testified before the grand jury.

But let’s be honest. There’s only one person anybody gives a shit about here, and that’s one Donald John Trump, Pestquire. And when the AP pressed by Alexander about whether or not Trump would be indicted, Kohrs stepped up as close as she could to the line without letting any toes go over it. She said, You’re not going to be shocked. It’s not rocket science. When The New York Times questioned her in their own interview, she replied, You won’t be surprised.

At this point, based on nothing more than the recorded phone call of Traitor Tot trying to hammer Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger to do whatever was necessary to find me the 11,780 votes to turn the Georgia election, there’s no question as to whether or not Trump engaged in election fraud. The only question was whether or not a Georgia grand jury would have the stones to actually indict Trump. The failure to do so would constitute a huge surprise. But the grand jury forewoman just told us not to expect any surprises. That’s good enough for me.

We all wondered whether or not a grand jury would actually vote to indict a former President of the United States. From what forewoman Emily Kohrs says, it appears they did. Now the only question is whether or not tough talking Fulton County DA Fani Willis has the chops to go after Trump, balls to the wall. Don’t touch that dial.

Help keep the site running, consider supporting.

9 COMMENTS

  1. She really should have kept her mouth shut. At the very least if she was doing what you suggest, getting a jump on promoting a book about her experience she should have been much more circumspect in her comments. She could have simply said “there were multiple recommendations for indictments and on multiple charges.” When pressed to reveal a number she should have stuck to “multiple indictments.” As for other comments, talking about more phone calls than the ones we know about was way the hell out of bounds, as was characterizing the testimony of specific witnesses. If she was going to open her trap she should have stuck to a more generic some witnesses were “out there but some were polite.” Fani Willis has to be furious and if she wasn’t called in for a chat with the judge earlier she will be tomorrow. And she’d better get herself a good lawyer. Hope she got a nice advance on that book because she’s about to spend it on legal fees to keep her from her own indictment! In the meantime, sounding off the way she did will be a gift to defense attorney’s once charges are actually filed. That’s why Willis is furious tonight. And remember, what’s said in a grand jury is secret unless and until it’s revealed in open court during proceedings. That makes who said what, be it witnesses, attorneys or other grand jurors as well as other information different than a jury in an actual trial. Like I said, if she’s writing a book she’s tossed away a good chunk of her earnings at the very least.

  2. Are we getting a little carried away here? Maybe it “sounds like” she’s writing a book, but here’s what actually happened:
    “The AP identified Kohrs after her name was included on subpoenas obtained through open records requests. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney advised Kohrs and other jurors on what they could and could not share publicly, including in interviews with the news media. During a lengthy recent interview, Kohrs complied with the judge’s instructions not to discuss details related to the jury’s deliberations. She also declined to talk about unpublished portions of the panel’s final report.”
    https://apnews.com/article/politics-new-york-city-only-on-ap-donald-trump-georgia-266e28c4e47e54731b233e0f770f6729

  3. The ‘esquire’ (usually abbreviated to just ‘squire) really was the hanger on of a knight – cleaned and polished his armour, groomed and fed his horse – all in the hope of, maybe, some day, becoming a knight himself.

    Just like a lot of lawyers I suppose – all hoping that some day they’ll get that tap on the shoulder making them a judge.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

The maximum upload file size: 128 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here