I don’t get Maggie Haberman, I really don’t.
One minute you’re opening up the New York Times and she’s got her byline on some really incisive, well researched piece of journalism, and just when you think maybe you’ve gotten her all wrong and, you then open up Twitter and see she has vomited up a glob of half digested disgusting drek like this:
The word abortion is not in this tweet https://t.co/1mev9z6w7n
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) August 3, 2022
I mean I could kinda understand her fluffing the Orangeutan, TFG is such a narcissistic idiot that any small amount of knob polishing could likely lead to the kinda of access and stupid ass admissions that can make a jorno’s career.
But why pick up your iphone13 just to dishonestly trash Joe Biden for paring down to 280 characters a lengthy press release which mentioned abortion more than once?
👇👇👇
— Luigi 😷😷😷😷 Scardoffi (@Luigi_Scardoffi) August 3, 2022
Maybe, Maggie, not everyone uses a rhetorical chainsaw when quieter discourse is called for:
This is intentional. Biden is using language that reframes the abortion issue in terms of Rights because this will resonate more with people who need to be converted to understand that abortion restrictions are actually an infringement on constitutional rights.
— martin J mcmahon (@MartinJmcmah) August 3, 2022
This gentleman noted a word missing from your own vocabulary…
— THEE Empress Nifina 💛 (@Kamesha2) August 3, 2022
Mr. Baldwin would like a word:
I’m sorry don’t you have a Trump story to promote?
— Sons of Killmonger (@2Strong2Silence) August 3, 2022
👇👇👇
https://twitter.com/WWhitness/status/1554794591865524224I
Republicans — and partisan media — do not get to set the narrative!https://t.co/fxPxidXorM
— Bonnie Motley (@Bon__Mots) August 3, 2022
Perhaps you could come up with a pithy response to this, Mags…
— Dr. Ohm 🇺🇲🌊🇺🇦 (@HereToRebuild) August 3, 2022
Do you really think you’re making a point? Do you really think there’s any ambiguity in the president’s statement? Your journalism in the past six years, at least when it comes to opining, has been an embarrassment.
— erik tarloff (@eriktarloff) August 3, 2022
Because abortion is healthcare. pic.twitter.com/btYxd0klGF
— Natasha💫BeTheChange (@natashablue22) August 3, 2022
👇👇👇
The word sellout isn't in your Twitter profile.
— Edelweißpirat- 🇺🇦Я з Україною🇺🇦 (@crandallgold) August 3, 2022
— Sons of Killmonger (@2Strong2Silence) August 3, 2022
Next time you feel like sticking a finger down your throat, do us all a favor and take advantage of your privacy.
And thank your stars you have a President that will defend it.
I thought Maggie Haberman had become irrelevant right after the Mango Menace left office. Why is she trying to throw shade on the one president that actually cares about people? The fact that her father was a well-respected journalist doesn’t automatically redound to her. She needs to go back to the tabloids where she started and where she obviously feels more comfortable.
Who the fuck is maggie haberman and who really cares about her opinion? By the way, who reads the nwt anyway?
Haberman is not happy unless she’s stirring a turd. If there isn’t a turd to stir she takes a crap and throws a handful in the punch bowl.