Meghan McCain, “Not Living Without Guns,” Husband’s Terrorist Threat

27
355

Meghan McCain made an unceremonious return to The View by declaring that gun owners would “resort to violence” if their gun rights were to be restricted (nothing like “good guys with guns, huh?). This is terrifying, brought to us by RawStory from The View:

“The AR-15 is by far the most popular gun in America, by far,” McCain told her co-hosts. “I was just in middle-of-nowhere Wyoming, (and) if you’re talking about taking people’s guns from them, there’s going to be a lot of violence.”

Ironically, the type of people who resort to violence if angry about the law are precisely the same people who should not own firearms. What happened to needing a gun to protect one’s family? I guess they believe guns may properly used to protect one’s own view of what the law should be.

I was not the only one who saw the insane juxtaposition of such a claim:

Yes, that appears to be exactly what she is saying. So, a “good guy with a gun” is only a “good guy” so long as he’s happy with the laws. There is a word for that type of guy, but it’s escaping me … criminal seems to be close.

Were that our only problem.

McCain’s husband, some nut named Ben Domenech, also believes he sits above both Congress and the Supreme Court, in determining the exact meaning of the Bill of Rights, especially the rights imbued by the Second Amendment.

“Yes, you fake conservative dipsh*t, people tend to fight back when you disrespect the Bill of Rights and try to illegally take their guns,” Domenech tweeted. “The Black Panthers did it in California when Reagan tried. We would do it too.”

See?

Even if Congress passed a law, even if the president signed the law, and even if the Supreme Court upheld the law, Meghan McCain’s non-fake, non-dipshit, husband has already determined it would, regardless, be “illegal” and he would be within his rights to fight using those same guns.

I have no idea what the Black Panthers have to do with anything, other to invoke black people in a struggle.

On this, be clear. When it comes to guns, these people do not believe any law could apply to them. They will not recognize the law, no matter how valid. They have given unto themselves their own “right” and will not be giving it up to any government. With respect to guns, they are above the government, above the very idea of democracy. This is the end-result of a gun industry campaign to equate guns to “freedom.” These people will shoot, and kill – according to McCain and husband – if “we the people” determine we want the laws changed.

There is a word for people who invoke terror in the name of their personal belief, threatening violence against those who disagree. We call them terrorists. And make no mistake, these terrorists base their beliefs in large part because of their race. How long do you think a group of young black men would last “open carrying” their AR-15s to a “Black Power” rally. How long do you think the Meghan McCain’s of the world would tolerate these same young black men stating that they WILL resort to violence before giving up their “2nd Amendment rights”? Texas is open carry. Do you think Texas would support eight young black men “open carrying” their AR-15 into a public square holding a Trump rally?

No. This is about “certain people’s” rights. Not everyone’s.

This nation is sick, and I don’t see it getting better. The fact that fellow citizens get gunned down routinely, first graders at school, to high schools, colleges, malls, concerts and night clubs, means nothing to them. They need their gun, damnit, to defend themselves from … law breakers? Different lawbreakers than them, we presume.

****

Peace, y’all. Strength without AR-15s

Jason

jmiciak@yahoo.com and Follow me on Twitter, please, @MiciakZoom

 

 

Liked it? Take a second to support Jason Miciak and PolitiZoom on Patreon!

Leave a Reply

27 Comments on "Meghan McCain, “Not Living Without Guns,” Husband’s Terrorist Threat"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Cmae
Guest

Unlike the murders already taking place? The view really needs her “conservative voice.” 💩💩👌

Bareshark
Guest
Gods, what a clueless nitwit! People used to give Chelsea Clinton a lot of grief for nepotism but Megan McCain makes her look like Joan of Arc by comparison. Also, I wonder how far these ammosexuals are willing to go. It’s one thing to mow down unarmed civilians or underarmed cops. But it’s another to face off against, say, a full platoon of the United States Army. In terms of raw firepower alone, I expect those cowards to last all of 1.3 seconds against the latter. The gun nuts are making a grave mistake here. However much the American people… Read more »
pwhitten
Member

Ammosexuals! Fantastic!

Bareshark
Guest

Can’t claim the credit for it…first heard it on Dailykos and loved it so much I’ve been using it since.

I can't take no more of this shit
Guest
I can't take no more of this shit

Yeah, it’s an oldie but a goodie

Don
Guest

Love it! I just used ‘gun fad’, but this is far better.

Lone Wolf
Member

These gun nuts you refer to, would piss themselves and run like hell if they even saw any police or soldiers. Female kitties all of them.

Bareshark
Guest

Yeah, talkers are rarely doers, Wolf. It’s one of many reasons I’ve got contempt for that crowd.

lauran
Member

Ruby Ridge comes to mind (Waco, TX takes a close second). Don’t think the US Army got involved but there was some pretty good sharpshooting by the government side (FBI, local sheriffs, state police, etc). My question is how will “the Federal government under orange one respond if such an insurrection evolves. If there are conflicting orders from the executive and the legislative branch in the event of an armed (lets be honest and name it “The Second Civil War”) whose side will the state and federal military take? Hmmmmmmmm…

Bareshark
Guest

You’re assuming that Mr. Tangerine Man would care. That’s a very dangerous assumption if you’re an ally he thinks is making him look bad.

lauran
Member

Good Point! Don’t care how Mr Tangerine reacts. More interested in how the various military forces at all levels react.

P J Evans
Guest

The only reason for ARs (and AKs) is to kill as many people as possible in as short a time as possible. They’re not good for anything else.

You get just as much protection from a shotgun, and you can use it for hunting too.

P J Evans
Guest

And yeah, we had long guns in the house. (To be accurate: pre-Civil War black-powder Kentucky rifles.) Later on my father collected a few antique rifles, and he inherited a horse pistol (legally a sawed-off shotgun, and he registered it).

I can't take no more of this shit
Guest
I can't take no more of this shit

And with a full choke, and some No.9 birdshot, you can clean up at the turkey shoot too! (NO, IT’S NOT TURKEYS, WE SHOOT TARGETS!)

Darrel
Member
Meghan McCain, has always shown a dominating style on the view, she does not have the Stirling open style of Whoopy, or the I think this, but understand there are other ideas to be considered, and will discuss, not preach, dictate or raise my voice, like Sunny is reasonably calm most of the time until reality becomes challenged in relation to laws … or the rights of children are overlooked … There have been some single minded, stubborn panelists on the view, they soon become annoying and less entertaining, Meghan is fast approaching that level on this subject alone …… Read more »
brakester
Member

He’ll with using guns to protect family! They use their guns to protect their guns! Guns are God’s.

brakester
Member

Spell checker got me.
Hell, not He’ll.

Gerald Boyette
Guest

Well written and well said sir.

beadlady
Member
Watched it and went ballistic! We own a couple shotguns and pistols. Inheritance and have not been shot. No one’s coming for those guns. MM and her bubbly hubby are NRA members (per her.) Bringing up the Black Panthers – god forbid black folks get more AK’s and AR’s. If that happens – whoooeeey you’re gonna see super gun reform. His comment is beyond racist. MM spouts RW propaganda. At least Abby reminded her about Sandy Hook. NO ONE IS COMING FOR THEIR PHUCKING GUNS. Just the AR’s and AK’s because the only one’s who should have automatic weapons are… Read more »
P J Evans
Guest

Swat tends to like shotguns. Nothing like the sound of one being racked to make people have second thoughts.

Lone Wolf
Member

Eh? If a swat team is coming for you, me, or anyone else, their shotgun, rifle, assault weapon, etc. WILL NOT be ‘racked’ ‘locked’ it will not need to be cocked, and/or loaded, it will most certainly be ready to fire. Swat, tends (not likes) to use military grade weapons as in the AR-15.

Joseph
Guest
Funny that McCain’s husband would invoke Reagan’s gun control. Especially since he got it all ass-backwards (like right-wingers tend to do). Reagan decided that guns HAD to be controlled BECAUSE a group of Black Panthers had been conducting armed patrols of Oakland (mainly while “copwatching”) and then they took to marching on Sacramento to protest a bill designed (by a Republican, of course–in fairness, though, some Democratic lawmakers cosponsored the bill) to stop the patrols. Per the Wiki article on the Mulford Act (the name of the bill), Reagan made the following comments regarding the situation: There was “no reason… Read more »